RE: stds-802-16: QoS Classes

["Arun Arunachalam" <arun@nortelnetworks.com>]

[Notice: It is the policy of 802.16 to treat messages posted here as non-confidential.]

Thanks Bill. The one-way delay we are assuming for IMT-2000 systems is about
100 ms and it is shown that there is no significant difference in the
overall quality or interruptability when the one-way delay transmission time
is maintained below 300ms. The exact partitioning of delay between various
systems have not been quantified    for IMT-2000 yet. May be we should come
up with for BWA as you had started in your last contribution.
REgards,
.......Arun

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Myers, William K. [SMTP:WMyers@spectrapoint.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, July 27, 1999 1:31 PM
> To:	'IEEE 802.16'
> Subject:	stds-802-16: QoS Classes
> 
> 
> [Notice: It is the policy of 802.16 to treat messages posted here as
> non-confidential.]
> 
> Ref: 802.16sc-99/28, good writeup Arun.  I like the idea of aligning the
> QoS
> definitions.  Do you have a suggested partitionioning of delay for the
> wireless access link we are specifying?
> 
> Would the codec, echo cancellor, protocol stack, and jitter buffer add up
> to
> about 50 ms for G.729 codec over IP?  I assume that MAC is responsible for
> the jitter buffer.
> 
> By the way, the SYSREQ comment you posted to the net on 7/22 was not
> readable, like it was in binary in place of txt.  You may want to resend
> it
> in text form.
> 
> Regards,
> Bill
>