[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
stds-802-16: venue for Session #11
I want to thank Naftali for graciously handling a difficult
situation. We appreciate his offer to host and look forward to
another chance for him to do so.
In the meantime, there are a few developments:
(1) ETSI BRAN is planning to meet in Sophia Antipolis, France on 30
Jan - 2 Feb 2001, the week after Session #11 is scheduled. I have
inquired as to their interest in hosting our session there. I haven't
(2) I have received an indication that a company would like to host
the session on Long Island.
(3) I have received an inquiry about hosting the session in Ottawa.
(4) The option for an unsponsored session in Boulder is still open
(though it is less attractive than a sponsored option).
I turned down an offer from 802.15 to have us join them and 802.11 in
Monterey on the week of January 15. There were two problems: (a) the
loss of a week would pressure our letter ballot deadlines; (b) that
week overlaps a technical symposium of the WCA, and I would be
concerned with losing participants to that event.
Based on the multiple alternatives, I think that we are going to find
this to be a tough decision that won't be as easy to make as I'd
hoped. Unless something interesting turns up with regard to ETSI, I
propose to postpone the decision until Session #10. Since Session #11
is currently scheduled to start more than 10 weeks after Session #10
ends, I think that this will be OK. I hope that the potential hosts
will provide concrete proposals before we get to Tampa.
P.S. 802.11 and 802.15 are finalizing May 14-18 as the dates of our
joint session in Orlando, so you can pencil in those dates for our
Session #13. Looking out to September, where we are again considering
a joint session, 802.11 and 802.15 are expecting to consider
proposals to meet in Australia, Finland, and Japan.
>Given the events of the previous weeks I agree that we need to postpone the
>meeting in Israel to better times. The time remaining does not allow to drag
>this decision any longer. It is not reasonable to convene in a place where
>people have concerns of their safety. It is disappointing to discover that
>the country I live in is less sane than I hoped.
>Wishing you all peace,
>From: Roger B. Marks [mailto:email@example.com]
>Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 11:28 PM
>Subject: stds-802-16: possible change of venue for Session #11
>802.16's Session #11 is currently planned for 22-26 January 2001 in
>Tel Aviv, Israel, with Naftali Chayat of BreezeCOM as the host.
>Under the current circumstances, it appears that there are risks
>associated with this venue. While we all hope that Israel is at peace
>in January, I think it is prudent to plan conservatively. My concern
>is that a number of people would pass up the meeting because of
>concerns of their own, of family members, or of company authorities.
>Last week, I began looking into a backup plan for Session #11. I took
>the simplest approach, calling the Regal Harvest House in Boulder,
>This hotel has hosted three previous 802.16 sessions (#0, #3, and
>#7.5). They have done a great job and have been easy to work with.
>It's a very nice and likable facility. At our request, they developed
>a system to accept registration fees at the front desk; this has
>worked fine. When you are running a meeting without a treasury, there
>really isn't any other way to do it.
>The weather is to be a problem that time of year, and the skiing
>should be fine for those who would like a side-trip. The hotel is
>less than a hour by shuttle from Denver International Airport. You
>can see more on the Session #7.5 logistics page
>Although our largest previous meeting at this Hotel was for 55
>people, they can easily accommodate far more. We have always used
>their smaller downstairs rooms, but this time I requested the
>ballroom, which divides into four segments; the capacities (with
>tables) are quoted as 84 in two of the rooms and 60 in the other two.
>They also have smaller rooms available if we need them. They are
>temporarily holding meeting rooms for us.
>I have consulted with Naftali. Though he would be disappointed if we
>changed our plans, he says that his company has not made financial
>Although it would be nice if we could wait until Session #10 to make
>this decision, I don't think that will be practical. No matter where
>we meet, people are traveling long distances to get there, and they
>need to make advance plans. I told the Harvest House I'd get back to
>them in the middle of next week.
>While I'd love to visit Israel, I think that we should go ahead and
>change our plans, postponing a meeting there until a more opportune
>moment. I would like to take until next Wednesday to see what
>everyone else on the reflector thinks.
>If you have a different venue in mind and want to commit to planning
>a session there, then by all means make a suggestion.
>Dr. Roger B. Marks <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Chair, IEEE 802.16 WG on Broadband Wireless Access <http://ieee802.org/16>
>phone: +1 303 497 3037 fax: +1 303 497 7828