[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

stds-802-16: TG1 COMMENTS




[Submitter's Last Name] 
Stanwood

[Submitter's First Name]
Ken

[Membership Status: (M)ember; (O)bserver; (N)either]
M

[Starting Page #]
260

[Starting Line #]
25

[(T)echnical for Content-Related Material; (E)ditorial for typos, grammar,
etc.;
(G)eneral to identify a problem but not a solution; (TBD) for a
comment on a section marked "TBD"]
E

[Detailed Description of Proposed Insertion, Deletion, Change]
Change first 2 occurrences of "frame" in this sentence to "MAC PDU or
fragment".
Change the third occurrence (on line 26) to "PDU".
Change the occurrence in line 39 to "MAC PDU or fragment's"

[Reason for Edit]
reflect current definition of frame vs. PDU.

[Submitter's Last Name] 
Stanwood

[Submitter's First Name]
Ken

[Membership Status: (M)ember; (O)bserver; (N)either]
M

[Starting Page #]
260

[Starting Line #]
43

[(T)echnical for Content-Related Material; (E)ditorial for typos, grammar,
etc.;
(G)eneral to identify a problem but not a solution; (TBD) for a
comment on a section marked "TBD"]
T

[Detailed Description of Proposed Insertion, Deletion, Change]
Change this paragraph to read "In the special case when the MAC PDU or
fragment's to-be-encrypted plaintext is less than 64 bits the data will not
be encrypted.

[Reason for Edit]
As note 12 indicates, CBC has the side effect that this case is actually
worse from a security point of view than not encrypting, so why implement
special logic?

[Submitter's Last Name] 
Stanwood

[Submitter's First Name] Ken

[Membership Status: (M)ember; (O)bserver; (N)either]
M

[Starting Page #]
261

[Starting Line #]
24

[(T)echnical for Content-Related Material; (E)ditorial for typos, grammar,
etc.;
(G)eneral to identify a problem but not a solution; (TBD) for a
comment on a section marked "TBD"]
E

[Detailed Description of Proposed Insertion, Deletion, Change]
Change "8-" to "8-byte"
On line 25, change "of each  are" to "of each byte are"
On line 26, change "that the  has" to "that the byte has"
On line 30, change "8-" to "8-byte"

[Reason for Edit]
typo

[Submitter's Last Name] 
Stanwood

[Submitter's First Name]
Ken

[Membership Status: (M)ember; (O)bserver; (N)either]
M

[Starting Page #]
271

[Starting Line #]
4

[(T)echnical for Content-Related Material; (E)ditorial for typos, grammar,
etc.;
(G)eneral to identify a problem but not a solution; (TBD) for a
comment on a section marked "TBD"]
E

[Detailed Description of Proposed Insertion, Deletion, Change]
Delete "FSDD or"

[Reason for Edit]
That mode doesn't exist anymore.

[Submitter's Last Name] 
Stanwood

[Submitter's First Name]
Ken

[Membership Status: (M)ember; (O)bserver; (N)either]
M

[Starting Page #]
271

[Starting Line #]
17

[(T)echnical for Content-Related Material; (E)ditorial for typos, grammar,
etc.;
(G)eneral to identify a problem but not a solution; (TBD) for a
comment on a section marked "TBD"]
E

[Detailed Description of Proposed Insertion, Deletion, Change]
Change "frame" to "PDU" here, in line 18, and in line 22.

[Reason for Edit]
Reflect current definition of frame in document.

[Submitter's Last Name] 
Stanwood

[Submitter's First Name]
Ken

[Membership Status: (M)ember; (O)bserver; (N)either]
M

[Starting Page #]
280

[Starting Line #]
25

[(T)echnical for Content-Related Material; (E)ditorial for typos, grammar,
etc.;
(G)eneral to identify a problem but not a solution; (TBD) for a
comment on a section marked "TBD"]
E

[Detailed Description of Proposed Insertion, Deletion, Change]
Change "frame" to "PDU"
In line 30, change "frames" to "PDUs"
In line 31, change "frame" to "PDU"

[Reason for Edit]
Reflect current definition of frame in document.

[Submitter's Last Name] 
Stanwood

[Submitter's First Name]
Ken

[Membership Status: (M)ember; (O)bserver; (N)either]
M

[Starting Page #]
281

[Starting Line #]
37

[(T)echnical for Content-Related Material; (E)ditorial for typos, grammar,
etc.;
(G)eneral to identify a problem but not a solution; (TBD) for a
comment on a section marked "TBD"]
E

[Detailed Description of Proposed Insertion, Deletion, Change]
delete "the following"

[Reason for Edit]
The parameters do not follow.

[Submitter's Last Name] 
Stanwood

[Submitter's First Name]
Ken

[Membership Status: (M)ember; (O)bserver; (N)either]
M

[Starting Page #]
281

[Starting Line #]
54

[(T)echnical for Content-Related Material; (E)ditorial for typos, grammar,
etc.;
(G)eneral to identify a problem but not a solution; (TBD) for a
comment on a section marked "TBD"]
T

[Detailed Description of Proposed Insertion, Deletion, Change]
There should be a capability negotiation long before the registration
request and response.

[Reason for Edit]
They're actually very far into the access process and this needs to be
resolved between the CPE and BS earlier.

[Submitter's Last Name] 
Stanwood

[Submitter's First Name]
Ken

[Membership Status: (M)ember; (O)bserver; (N)either]
M

[Starting Page #]
297

[Starting Line #]
51

[(T)echnical for Content-Related Material; (E)ditorial for typos, grammar,
etc.;
(G)eneral to identify a problem but not a solution; (TBD) for a
comment on a section marked "TBD"]
T

[Detailed Description of Proposed Insertion, Deletion, Change]
Delete the first sentence.  Change the start of the next sentence from "When
the transmission convergence layer is enabled," to "At the transmission
convergence layer"

[Reason for Edit]
The TC layer should not be able to be disabled in the uplink. It provides a
valuable resynchronization capability.  For GPT terminals it is necessary
since multiple PDUs from a multitude of connections are concatenated into a
single burst.  Even in GPC mode, the PDU concatenation is defined such that
if a CPE is granted back to back allocations for more than one connection,
they are concatenated into a single burst which opens the possibility that
the PDU from a subsequent connection starts in the middle of an FEC block.

[Submitter's Last Name] 
Stanwood

[Submitter's First Name]
Ken

[Membership Status: (M)ember; (O)bserver; (N)either]
M

[Starting Page #]
297

[Starting Line #]
60

[(T)echnical for Content-Related Material; (E)ditorial for typos, grammar,
etc.;
(G)eneral to identify a problem but not a solution; (TBD) for a
comment on a section marked "TBD"]
E

[Detailed Description of Proposed Insertion, Deletion, Change]
Change "frame" to "PDU".
On line 63, change "frames" to "PDUs".
On page 298, line 1, change "frame" to " PDU"

[Reason for Edit]
Reflect current definition of frame in document.

[Submitter's Last Name] 
Stanwood

[Submitter's First Name]
Ken

[Membership Status: (M)ember; (O)bserver; (N)either]
M

[Starting Page #]
311

[Starting Line #]
11

[(T)echnical for Content-Related Material; (E)ditorial for typos, grammar,
etc.;
(G)eneral to identify a problem but not a solution; (TBD) for a
comment on a section marked "TBD"]
T

[Detailed Description of Proposed Insertion, Deletion, Change]
delete the Transmission convergence layer row from the table.

[Reason for Edit]
The TC layer should not be able to be disabled in the uplink. It provides a
valuable resynchronization capability.  For GPT terminals it is necessary
since multiple PDUs from a multitude of connections are concatenated into a
single burst.  Even in GPC mode, the PDU concatenation is defined such that
if a CPE is granted back to back allocations for more than one connection,
they are concatenated into a single burst which opens the possibility that
the PDU from a subsequent connection starts in the middle of an FEC block.