[STDS-802-16] UPDATE: Revised Comments for IEEE P802.16-REVd/D4
THE COMMENT FILE HAS BEEN UPDATED TO 20r4. THE 20r3 VERSION IS DEFECTIVE.
Roger
The deadline for revised IEEE P802.16-REVd/D4 comments has passed.
The data is available here:
http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_20r4.zip
The revised comments are in the fields "Recommendation", "Proposed
Resolution", "Reason for Recommendation", and "Recommendation by".
We also received a number of new and revised contributions. I've
filed most of these on the TGd web page. I'll catch up with the last
three soon.
The Ballot Resolution Committee (BRC) will now begin considering each
of these proposals. Each member may vote either "Accept" or "Reject"
on each revised comment. See the procedure document for details.
I will email the voting instructions to the BRC separately (I've had
some technical difficulties, but I have a backup plan). In the
meantime, I suggest that you carefully review the database and begin
discussing the final comments with your colleagues as you deem
appropriate.
Roger
>We received 1305 reply comments to the comments received in the
>P802.16-REVd/D4 Sponsor Ballot recirculation.
>
>These reply comments have been added to the comment package, which
>is now available:
> http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_20r2.zip
>
>The file is set to open to a layout showing the replies, in
>abbreviated form. If more than three replies were submitted for a
>given comment, you will need to scroll to see them all. For a more
>spacious view of the reply comments, click "See reply details" above
>the colored Reply Comment table.
>
>In accordance with the announced comment resolution procedures:
> http://ieee802.org/16/docs/04/80216-04_18r1.pdf
>those who submitted the original comments are now invited to
>reconsider their comments in the light of:
>
>(a) the reply comments
>(b) other comments in the database that address relevant issues
>
>To submit your revised comment, please follow the same procedure for
>submitting Reply Comments, using the fields "Recommendation ", "
>Proposed Resolution ", " Reason for Recommendation ", and "
>Recommendation by". Email your revised comment files to
>ballot16d@wirelessman.org by Wednesday 28 April AOE (Anywhere on
>Earth).
>
>ADVICE TO COMMENTORS:
>
>In light of the defined procedure, there will be no opportunity for
>the Ballot Resolution Committee (BRC) to alter the revised comments;
>the BRC can only accept or reject them. Therefore, those who
>submitted comments are strongly encouraged to study the database,
>not only with respect to their own comments but also with respect to
>related comments. If you have a concern that related comments might
>affect yours, please contact the other balloter to coordinate your
>responses. Please ensure that your Suggested Remedy is fully
>explicit, with detailed changes by page and line number, so that the
>editor may implement it without doubt as to your intent. If your
>comment refers to an external contribution, please refer to its
>explicit contribution number, including the revision number, at
><http://ieee802.org/16/tgd/#Contributions>.
>
>Please remember that your revised comment will be voted upon,
>verbatim, by the BRC. The BRC members, when considering their vote,
>will look to see whether your comment makes a convincing argument in
>favor of the need for a change to the draft. They will also be
>looking for evidence that you have fully addressed all concerns
>raised in the reply comments and have considered alternatives
>proposed there. You are encouraged eliminate any doubt the BRC
>members have doubts about the change.
>
>Please contact me with any questions.
>
>Roger
--
Dr. Roger B. Marks <mailto:marks@nist.gov> +1 303 497 3037
National Institute of Standards and Technology/Boulder, CO, USA
Chair, IEEE 802.16 Working Group on Broadband Wireless Access
<http://WirelessMAN.org>