Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[STDS-802-16] my recommendations on comment resolution voting



Personally, I recommend voting Reject on a number of comments that
are meaningless because they have been superceded. I don't think you
should waste time thinking about them:

Comment 171: This was superceded by 170; the lines can't be changed
because they were deleted by 170.

Comment 230: This was superceded by 229; the lines can't be changed
because they were deleted by 229.

Comment 52: The entire change was already made in Comment 53. Comment
52 won't change that either way.

Comment 169: This says to accept the changes in 168. Those changes
have already been accepted. Comment 169 won't change that either way.

Comment 232: This says to accept the changes in 202. Those changes
have already been accepted. Comment 232 won't change that either way.

All of these should have been withdrawn, in my opinion.

If I'm mistaken, please say so.

Roger