Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[STDS-802-16] [STDS-802-16-MOBILE] [HARMONIZATION] Minutes from 7/26 Telecon agenda



Title: [STDS-802-16-MOBILE] [HARMONIZATION] 7/26 Telecon agenda; inventory of comments/contribs
Next Telecon:
Please note that the telecon on Thursday, 7/29 has been canceled based on Monday's discussions.
 
The next telecon will be scheduled on Monday, 8/2. The new proposed time is 4 PM U.S. Pacific time. Bridge logistics will be circulated shortly.
 
Discussions:
We reviewed the list of contributions that were circulated earlier. The list was updated based on suggestions on the reflector. Plan to make progress in each category is summarized below.
 
Category: MBS Support:
* Comment 341 (Contrib. 04/201r1) - Enhanced broadcast / multicast capabilities 
Yong Chang was not available to discuss MBS; decision was to postpone until next week.
 
 Category: Handover Support:
* Comment 353 (Contrib. 04/156r1) - Safety Channel HO
Samsung is reworking their contribution based on feedback at the Portland Plenary. They expect to have an update by the end of next week (8/6).
 
* Soft HO and Fast BS switching - complete specifications especially Fast feedback channel and SDLs
We captured 3 action items as next steps:
1. Mo-Han to send out an email summarizing list of changes needed to complete SHO/FBSS support in .16e
2. Mo-Han to reinitiate discussions within SHO/FBSS harmonization team to make progress on pending issues. Anyone interested in participating in offline discussions should let Mo-Han know ASAP.
3. Masoud and Kamran will upload new text on their harmonization proposal for SHO/FBSS by Monday, 8/2. 
 
* Definition of PHY MODE ID in NBR-ADV message
Jungwon is working on a contribution and will have it available for review in about a week.
 
* Comment 483 (backbone signaling) - this is ruled out of scope, so do we want to come up with requirements / assumptions for another TG to work on or perhaps propose informative text on assumptions for handover support?
This was not discussed.
 
* Comments 530, 532
This was not discussed.
 
* Support for 1x3 frequency reuse scenarios
Kamran and John Humbert will develop a contribution summarizing technical requirements for handover support in 1x3 frequency reuse scenarios. Adhoc team will complete a gap analysis based on this contribution and a review of the D4 draft.
 
* Preferred base station for handoffs - follow-up to contribution 04/142
Kamran will upload a new contribution to continue discussions next week.

Category: Idle mode and Paging Support:
We are aware of 4 pending contributions:

* Comment 527 (Contrib. 04/222) - Enhanced paging in MOB-PAG-ADV

* Comment 348 (Contrib. 04_155r1, Handling DL Traffic for Idle mode MSSs) 

* Comment 367 (Contrib. 04/199) - Quick Connection Setup in Idle mode

* Comment 368 (Contrib. 04/198) - Location Management for supporting Idle mode in 802.16e

Phil Barber, Ronny Kim and others are working on a harmonized contribution that will incorporate the above 4 contributions + a few other issues. Draft will be upload by Monday and reviewed on the conf call next week. 

Category: Scanning and Association related Optimizations:
* Comment 315 (Contrib. 04/167r2) - Enhancement of scanning and association  

Contribution was revised to 04/167r3. Jungje Son will rework this next week. LGe is planning to submit a new contrib. related to scanning and association; these two contributions will be harmonized.

 Category: Fixes to SDLs and informative text in Annexes:
* No contributions on this to date  

Category: Miscellaneous:
* Comment 309 (Periodic ranging while in Sleep mode) - was rejected
* Comment 310 (Contrib. 04/194r1) - was rejected  

Jungje, Vladimir are working on a harmonized  version of the above 2 contributions. Expect to have it completed by end of next week (8/6).  

* Comment 324 (Service Level Prediction)

This was not discussed.

* Comment 370 (Contrib. 04/48r4) 

 Follow-up on the reflector.

* Comment 537 (Contrib. 04/213r2)

First draft expected in about a week.

Plus - Following comments were withdrawn, do we need to revisit them -
#293, #294  - No plans to follow-up.