Re: [STDS-802-16] Concerns regarding leftover comment resolution

["Johnston, Dj" <dj.johnston@INTEL.COM>]

Yes,

The minutes of the MAC 16e sessions indicate that 511r1 and 512r1 were accepted.

 

"
C802.16e-511r1 Sungcheoi Chang
Accepted by unanimous consent

 

C802.16e-512r1 Sungcheoi Chang
Accepted by unanimous consent
"

 

There was an error in my summary list of accepted items where I omitted 512r1, but it's recorded accurately  the minutes.

 

DJ

 

---

From: csyoon@etri.re.kr [mailto:csyoon@etri.re.kr]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 8:32 PM
To: Roger B. Marks; STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Cc: Johnston, Dj; brian.kiernan@interdigital.com
Subject: [STDS-802-16] Concerns regarding leftover comment resolution

Dear Roger and DJ,

 

I found some mistakes in database on leftover comments (IEEE 802.16-04/75). 

 

Two comments (Comment #1028-Contribution 511r1 & Comment #1027 - Contribution 512r1) are already resolved ones during the session #34 (17 Nov. Thursday Morning MAC session chaired by David Johnston; Sungcheol Chang presented these contributions.) and these comments were accepted without no objections.

 

So, I insist on that these comments should not be treated as leftover items.

These shall be considered as resolved ones (i.e., accepted).

 

Thanks,

 

 

Chulsik Yoon