Re: [STDS-802-16] Note: +++IEEE 802.16 Letter Ballot #24 (on P802.16h/D1) is now open+++
Joey,
Yes, we have a bug that needs to be fixed. It affects 2.11 and 2.12.
I am working on this.
Roger
On Nov 2, 2006, at 11:13 AM, Chou, Joey wrote:
> Roger,
>
> I try to check the "Dis" box for 16i comments. But I got this error
> message.
>
> "Your access privilege does not allow you to perform this action"
>
> Regards,
>
> Joey Chou
> MG Wireless Standard & Technology, Intel
> (480)554-6672
> (602)820-1806 (Cell)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger B. Marks [mailto:r.b.marks@ieee.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 10:33 AM
> To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: [STDS-802-16] Note: +++IEEE 802.16 Letter Ballot #24 (on
> P802.16h/D1) is now open+++
>
> I'd like to clarify a Commentary feature relevant to LB #24 (and LB
> #20).
>
> In previous versions of Commentary, comments could be marked
> "Binding" or "Non-binding". This terminology was borrowed years ago
> from another 802 WG, but the wording is mysterious.
>
> In Commentary 2, the wording is changed. When you enter your comment
> (on the Member/Comment Entry view), you are asked to label your
> comment "Type" as Technical or Editorial. After the "Type" field you
> see a checkbox labeled "Part of Dis". This is how you indicate that
> it is part of your Disapprove vote; i.e., "Binding".
>
> I've posted a 2.12beta version <http://dot16.org/Commentary> that
> includes a pop-up help message explaining this checkbox. It reads
> "Check this box if this comment must be satisfied in order to convert
> your Disapprove vote to Approve. If you vote Approve, you should not
> check this box."
>
> P.S. Commentary 2.12beta includes a few other minor improvements, but
> you need not upgrade. One minor issue is that the on-line membership
> status is not working in 2.11beta because I failed to include the URL
> <http://ieee802.org/16/memberlist.html> in the Member List URL field
> (under Chair's View/Set Globals). You can fix this in 2.11beta
> yourself. Or you can use 2.12beta. Or you can ignore it, because it's
> just a minor convenience factor for the user.
>
> Regards,
>
> Roger
>
>
>
>
>> To: IEEE 802.16 Reflector
>> bcc: IEEE 802.16 Working Group Members <http://ieee802.org/16/
>> members.html>
>>
>> IEEE 802.16 Working Group Letter Ballot #24 is now open, through 10
>> November 2006 AOE. The ballot is on the following question:
>>
>> *"To forward IEEE P802.16h/D1 <http://ieee802.org/16/pubs/
>> 80216h.html> for LMSC Sponsor Ballot."
>>
>> The draft is posted:
>> http://ieee802.org/16/pubs/80216h.html
>> Thanks to Technical Editor Xuyong Wu for the excellent work!
>>
>> The announcement document:
>> Title: "IEEE 802.16 Working Group Letter Ballot #24: Announcement"
>> Document Number: IEEE 802.16-06/059
>> URL: <http://ieee802.org/16/docs/06/80216-06_059.pdf>
>>
>> details the procedures. It also tells you how to participate and
>> explains the Members' obligation to do so. "Membership shall be
>> lost if two consecutive, or two of any three consecutive, Working
>> Group letter ballots for which the member was eligible are not
>> returned or are returned with an abstention other than for 'lack of
>> technical expertise'."
>>
>> The ballot submission form is available at:
>> http://dot16.org/ballot24/ballotform24.html
>>
>> PLEASE NOTE that comment submissions will require Commentary
>> 2.01beta, which is not yet available. It will be released soon. The
>> current release (2.0beta) is seems to be OK for purposes of LB#23,
>> but it has some problems that prevent its use for LB#24.
>>
>> Results will be posted, as they are received, at:
>> http://ieee802.org/16/le/ballot24/report24.html
>>
>> Roger
>>
>> Roger B. Marks <:r.b.marks@ieee.org>
>> Chair, IEEE 802.16 Working Group on Broadband Wireless Access
>> <http://WirelessMAN.org>
>
>