Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-16] [802.16n][DC] DC RG E-mail list



Dear Brian, Ron, and all,

 

Thanks for your comments on DC RG E-mail list.

I withdraw DC RG E-mail list and all the DC RG technical discussions will be on the 16 reflector.

 

Best regards,

Sungcheol Chang, DC RG co-chair

 

From: Kiernan, Brian G [mailto:Brian.Kiernan@INTERDIGITAL.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 6:38 AM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] [802.16n][DC] DC RG E-mail list

 

It is important that all discussions appear on the regular reflector.  No private e-mail lists should be used for RG discussions.

 

Brian

 

From: Ron Murias [mailto:ron@MURIAS.CA]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 12:05 PM
To: STDS-802-16@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] [802.16n][DC] DC RG E-mail list

 

Dear DC RG Co-chairs,

 

I appreciate what you're trying to do, but this is what the reflector is for.  Trying to maintain a separate email list is problematic and I would prefer to see the discussions here.

 

Regards,

Ron Murias

 

 

On 2011-04-11, at 5:22 AM, Chang, Sungcheol wrote:

 

Dear 802.16n folks,

 

DC RG has announced that all the e-mails on technical discussion send via 16 reflector.

But, as the number of e-mails increase, these e-mails bother 16n participants who are not interesting in the technical e-mail discussion about DC.

Id like to use an e-mail list for DC e-mail discussion.

Even though DC RG uses the e-mail list for discussion, anyone can join it.

 

At first I made an e-mail list based on the contributions related to DC RG.

The e-mail list (C80216n-rg-11_0042.doc) has been uploaded to the RG upload directory.

If the list needs to add/change/remove, please let me know.

 

I will announce again when we use the e-mail list in technical e-mail discussion after the e-mail list is stable with feedbacks from 16n participants.

 

Best regards,

DC RG co-chairs