Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[802.19] FW: [802.19] Link to 802.16h CA doc



Posting from Mariana

 

From: Mariana Goldhamer [mailto:marianna.goldhammer@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 10:42 AM
To: Shellhammer, Steve
Subject: FW: [802.19] Link to 802.16h CA doc

 

Steve,

 

I am probably not subscribed to the 802.19 reflector, such that my previous e-mail will not be posted. Can you pls forward it?

 

Mariana

 


From: Shellhammer, Steve [mailto:sshellha@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 6:24 PM
To: Mike Lynch; STDS-802-19@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Mariana Goldhamer
Subject: RE: [802.19] Link to 802.16h CA doc

 

Mike,

 

                I cannot speak about the 5GHz band.  I do know that there is some interest in the 3650MHz band in the US and there may also be Wi-Fi there.

 

                Marianna can probably elaborate more.

 

Steve

 

From: Mike Lynch [mailto:freqmgr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 6:36 AM
To: STDS-802-19@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [802.19] Link to 802.16h CA doc

 

Steve,

 

I’m curious why .16h has developed or is developing a coexistence mechanism for the 5 – 6 GHz frequency band. There are specific technologies in ITU-R Recommendation M.1450 that are to be used in the unlicensed portions of that band. True, in some countries the rules governing the 5.8 GHz portion could permit .16h.

 

Is there an intention to try and add .16h to M.1450 or is .16h only intended for use at 5.8 GHz in those countries whose regulations permit it? If the former then .16h will have to have a DFS or DFS like capability to sense the non-RLAN systems that share the unlicensed band segments.

 

WRC-2003 established very clear requirements for RLAN use of the 5 GHz frequency band. DFS is not an optional requirement for coexistence in the 5250 – 5350 and 5470 – 5725 MHz portions of that frequency band.

 

Regards,

 

Mike

 

From: 강현덕 [mailto:henry@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 20:44
To: STDS-802-19@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [802.19] Link to 802.16h CA doc

 

FYI

 

This document deals with coordinated coexistence mechanism called CX-CBP (coordinated contention based protocol).

 

802.16h (improved coexistence mechanisms for license-exempt operation)  mainly consists of three different degignation (all  in TDD mode)

1. WirelessHUMAN (for 5~6GHz bands)

2. WirelessMAN-CX (for bands below 11GHz subject to non-exclusive assignment)

3. WirelessMAN-UCP (for bands below 11GHz subject to non-exclusive assignment)

 

CX-CBP belongs to WirelessMAN-CX.

Uncoordinated coexistence mechanism belongs to WirelessMAN-UCP.

 

 

Hyunduk

 


-----
원본 메시지-----
From: "Shellhammer, Steve" <sshellha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From Date: 2009-07-08
오전 8:38:09
To: "STDS-802-19@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <STDS-802-19@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:
Subject: Link to 802.16h CA doc

Image removed by sender.



************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses(190).
************************************************************************************



************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses(43).
************************************************************************************



************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses(43).
************************************************************************************