A couple of questions on clause 52
Would someone please remind me:
1. Why is it that in the OMA tables that we spec the dBm range in OMA/2
instead of just OMA? We specify the Rx in OMA (dBm). Are we just testing to
see if the user knows to add 3dB when working on the link budgets? :-)
2. What did we mean in Table 52-21 that the Minimum dispersion in ps/nm for
ER/EW be the worst of i) 0.93... and ii) 0?
If Lamda is within the specifications (1530 to 1565 nm) required for ER/EW,
when would 0 (zero) be the worst case?
jonathan