Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[802SEC] Re: Spam List




All,

Looks like experimenting has had results that I had not anticipated.  I
am terminating the testing.

Thanks for your tolerance,

wlq

Mark Klerer wrote:
> 
> Bill,
> 
> I have just spoken to our IT people and they tell me they subscribe to an
> external e-mail anti spam service that provides them with SPAM e-mail
> addresses. They have configured our service to ignore this warniong for your
> ip address. According to them you have been placed on the multihop.dsbl.org
> spamer list. You will need to contact them to get removed.
> 
> Mark
> 
> ---------------------
> 
> You have just been placed on the Flarion Spam list by our Network SPAM
> Algorithm I will have you removed. This is a heads up it may be happening to
> you at other locations too.
> 
> Mark
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Administrator
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 4:30 PM
> To: Mark Klerer
> Subject: FW: [802SEC] Please ignore - 802 SEC exploder delay test
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Quackenbush [mailto:billq@attglobal.net]
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 4:17 PM
> To: Mark Klerer
> Subject: Re: [802SEC] Please ignore - 802 SEC exploder delay test
> 
> Mark,
> 
> I think that would be quite appropriate.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> wlq
> 
> Mark Klerer wrote:
> >
> > Bill,
> >
> > I would also suggest that we clean out the Archive after you have run all
> > this tests.
> >
> > Mark
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bill Quackenbush [mailto:billq@attglobal.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 11:41 AM
> > To: Bob O'Hara
> > Cc: IEEE 802 SEC
> > Subject: Re: [802SEC] Please ignore - 802 SEC exploder delay test
> >
> > Bob,
> >
> > I am sorry if the tests are annoying you.  I was planning on running
> > them through tomorrow.  I recognized that I am generating a lot of
> > traffic relative to real 802 SEC traffic.  But that is the only way that
> > I think has a chance (not certainty) of catching some of the long
> > reflector delays.  I have tried to make the test message easy to find
> > and delete based on the content of the subject line.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > wlq
> >
> > Bob O'Hara wrote:
> > >
> > > Bill,
> > >
> > > How many more of these can we expect?  The tests are outrunning the
> > > volume of the real traffic on the reflector!
> > >
> > >  -Bob
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bill Quackenbush [mailto:billq@attglobal.net]
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 7:38 AM
> > > To: IEEE 802 SEC
> > > Subject: [802SEC] Please ignore - 802 SEC exploder delay test
> > >
> > > Test