Re: [802SEC] +++ SEC MOTION +++ Motion to Forward 15.2 D9 toRevCom
Approve.
Roger
At 6:20 PM -0400 03/04/17, Paul Nikolich wrote:
>Dear SEC,
>
>This is a 14 day SEC email ballot to make a determination on the
>below SEC motion to authorize forwarding 802.15.2 D9 to RevCom.
>Moved by Bob Heile, Seconded by Stuart Kerry
>
>The email ballot opens on Thursday April 17, 2003 6:30PM EDT and
>closes Thursday May 1, 2003 6:30PM EDT.
>
>Please direct your responses to the SEC reflector with a CC directly
>to me (<mailto:p.nikolich@ieee.org>p.nikolich@ieee.org).
>
>Regards,
>
>--Paul Nikolich
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Bob Heile" <<mailto:bheile@ieee.org>bheile@ieee.org>
>To: <<mailto:p.nikolich@ieee.org>p.nikolich@ieee.org>
>Cc: <<mailto:stuart@ok-brit.com>stuart@ok-brit.com>;
><<mailto:Stuart.Kerry@philips.com>Stuart.Kerry@philips.com>;
><<mailto:shell@symbol.com>shell@symbol.com>;
><<mailto:david.cypher@nist.gov>david.cypher@nist.gov>; "bob Heile"
><<mailto:bheile@ieee.org>bheile@ieee.org>
>Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 7:08 AM
>Subject: Move to Forward 15.2 D9 to RevCom
>
>
>> Paul
>>
>> I would like to start a 10 day SEC email Letter Ballot.
>>
>> Having successfully completed Sponsor Ballot, Move to Forward 802.15.2
>> Draft 9 to RevCom.
>>
>> Supporting documentation has been issued in previous emails to the SEC.
>>
>> moved: Bob Heile
>> second: Stuart Kerry
>>
>>
>> Bob Heile, Ph.D
>> Chair, IEEE 802.15 Working Group on Wireless Personal Area Networks
>> Chair, ZigBee Alliance
>> 11 Louis Road
>> Attleboro, MA 02703 USA
>> Phone: 508-222-1393
>> Mobile: 781-929-4832
>> Fax: 508-222-0515
>> email: <mailto:bheile@ieee.org>bheile@ieee.org
>>
>
>Supporting Documentation:
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Bob Heile
>To: <mailto:stds-802-sec@ieee.org>stds-802-sec@ieee.org
>Cc: <mailto:shell@symbol.com>shell@symbol.com ;
><mailto:david.cypher@nist.gov>david.cypher@nist.gov
>Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 6:10 PM
>Subject: [802SEC] Report on 15.2 Recirculation Ballot
>
>
>The 15.2 Recirculation ballot closed on April 15. The results were:
>
>1. This ballot has met the 75% returned ballot requirement.
>66 eligible people in this ballot group.
>48 affirmative votes
>1 negative votes with comments
>0 negative votes without comments
>7 abstention votes
>=====
>56 votes received = 84% returned
>12% abstention
>2. The 75% affirmation requirement is being met.
>48 affirmative votes
>1 negative votes with comments
>=====
>49 votes = 97% affirmative
>
>We received one new affirmative and one of the no voters changed their vote
>to affirmative. The one remaining no vote was from the previous ballot and
>was ruled then as not a valid technical comment and made part of the
>recirculation. (copy below) There has been no response from that voter.
>
>Given that there are no new no votes and no changes required to the draft,
>I will be making a motion to the SEC, via a 10 day letter ballot, to
>forward Draft 9 to RevCom in time for the May 2 submission deadline.
>
>
>Comment received on Draft 8 and recirculated with Draft 9:
>
>CommenterName CommentType CommentID Clause Subclause Page Line
>O'Farrell, Timothy T 8 D 89
>Comment
>The source code of Appendix D is provided without a flow diagram schematic.
>To enhance understanding and accessibility of the program material a flow
>diagram schematic is required.
>SuggestedRemedy
>Include a flow diagram schematic of the source code presented in Appendix D.
>Response
>REJECT.
>The BRC does not know of any requirements to supply a flow diagram for code,
>therefore one will not be created and included. BRC does not consider this a
>technical comment on the draft, since it relates to a informative annex.