| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Dear EC Members, This is a 10 day email ballot to make a determination on the following motion. The ballot opens 6:30PM EDT 23 April 2004 and closes 6:30PM EDT 3 May 2004. Motion: To conditionally approve forwarding P802.17 to RevCom under procedure 10 of the LMSC P&P. Moved: Mike Takefman Second: Bob O'Hara. Regards, --Paul Nikolich Dear EC Members, In the preceding email, I detailed the results of our last recirculation ballot and our plan moving forward. I therefore make the following EC email ballot motion: Move to conditionally approve forwarding P802.17 to RevCom under procedure 10 of the LMSC P&P. May I have a second? cheers, mike ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Takefman" <tak@CISCO.COM> To: <STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 1:56 PM Subject: [802SEC] Result of 802.17 D3.2 Recirculation / Conditional Approval > > Dear EC Members, > > On April 21, 2004 the CRG of 802.17 met to resolve comments on > the Sponsor Ballot Recirculation of P802.17 D3.2. The recirculation > ballot closed on April 16, 2004. > > I regret to inform the EC that I believe we have failed to > meet the conditions set forth in Procedure 10. Specifically, > (item 4) we have chosen to make some changes to the draft that do > constitute technical changes (and are detailed below). > > That being said, as the volume of comments were down > substantially from previous ballots and the operational technical > change corrects a rather obscure corner case I will be > requesting the EC to grant conditional approval again > under Procedure 10 via an email ballot (to follow > after this email). > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > P802.17 D3.2 Recirc Statistics: Ballot closed on April 16, 2004. > > 76 Approve 4 Disapprove 5 Abstains = 95% Affirmative > > No new disapprove voters: > > Note: One of the disapprove voters had flipped his vote via email to > me but did not submit a new ballot. Therefore the Approval ratio > could be as high as 96% (77/3/5). > > 67 comments were received from 7 commentors: > Only 1 negative balloter submitted comments (30 comments) > > 30 Editorial comments > 9 Technical Binding comments from an existing negative voter > 28 Technical Non Binding comments from approving voters > > No new valid disapprove votes or comments on new issues that were > not resolved to the satisfaction of the disapprove voter. > > 5 unresolved comments from a negative voter. All comments were > against non-changebar text. 4 were restatements of issues raised > in previous ballots, 1 was an editorial change (to reformat a > table) marked as a technical issue. > > Technical/Operational Change: > -An error was found in the protection state machine. A corner > case/race condition that is highly unlikely to occur in a real system > but is theoretically possible was fixed. > > Technical/Non Operational Change: > -IETF review of the MIB found that a few initialization > values / indentifiers were incorrect and caused MIB compilation > to fail. > > Pseudo-Technical / Editorial Change: > -inconsistent use of units for 1 variable. One variable was marked as > being in micro-seconds (with its default being 1000), whereas the other > related variables in the same state machine used milliseconds. > -3 changes in existing PICs statements > -2 optional PICs statements added > -missing references > -other minor editorial fixes > > > Moving Forward: > > http://www.ieee802.org/17/member/draftballots/d3_3/index.htm contains > the latest draft and all associated documentation. > > Draft 3.3 and associated comments were created and forwarded to SA Staff > for Recirculation Ballot. Balloting started on date April 23, with > end date May 8. > > Assuming that the EC grants conditional approval for 802.17 D3.3: > > A teleconference will be held Monday May 10th, 2004 to review comments / > determine if we can submit to RevCom. > > Recirculation ballot will be started May 13th (as appropriate). > > cheers, > > mike > > > ---------- > This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv. > ---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
P802_17D3_2_unsatisfied_v3.pdf