Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] <no subject>



John,

 

Thanks for the reminder. Historically 802 has opposed FCC receiver rules, saying rather that the standards should take care of that. It may be good just to discuss to make certain that is still the agreed view.

 

Best regards,

 

Mike

 

From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** [mailto:STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John H Notor
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 12:24 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [802SEC] <no subject>

 

FYI,

 

We did not respond to the initial request for comment. If there is any interest, we still can, even as late as the July Plenary.

 

Released:  06/10/2013.  OFFICE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY EXTENDS COMMENT PERIOD FOR TECHNOLOGICAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (TAC) WHITE PAPER AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVING RECEIVER PERFORMANCE. (DA No.  13-1344). (Dkt No 13-101 ). Comments Due:  07/22/2013. Reply Comments Due:  08/07/2013.  OET . Contact:  Robert Pavlak at (202) 418-0761, email: Robert.Pavlak@fcc.gov or Ronald Repasi at (202) 418-0768, email: Ronald.Repasi@fcc.gov http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-13-1344A1.docx

 

John

 

John Notor
President/Chief Technologist
Notor Research

Mobile: 1.408.799.2738
Skype:  1.408.457.1814 

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.