Pont #1 is a question – and I agree that
would be beyond editorial.
I approved already.
point #2, easy edit and I was wondering about the line
point #1, not sure if adding technical insight is crossing
the editorial boundary or not, even if it doesn’t would need
to work with the TAG and probably would have to start EC
vote over. with that, we would miss the deadline we were
given. are you, or others, concerned enough for us to miss
the deadline and see if they would still accept our comments
enables long distance connectivity to unserved and
underserved areas. This is because these bands have a very
good propagation characteristics.
Comment – this is
very ambiguous – can we provide any technical insight – what
reach is served?
IEEE 802.15.4m (now rolled into the IEEE 802.15.4 base
standard) could be considered.
Comment – I would
suggest rewording this – as it is using standards “geek” talk
that many will not get –
like – Also, IEEE 802.15.4 was recently revised to include
IEEE 802.15.4m amendment.
From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive
Committee List ***** <STDS-802-SEC@ieee.org> On
Behalf Of Holcomb, Jay
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2018 8:55 PM
Subject: [802SEC] +++10-day EC Motion+++ Approval
of IEEE 802 Comments to Uganda TVWS consultation, due by
I would like
to announce the start of an EC motion on comments to the
Uganda Communications Commission (UCC), on guidelines for
use of TV White Space in Uganda. The deadline for
comments from a UCC email received, is 10 August 2018.
delegated to me to conduct an EC electronic ballot on the
motion is per 802 OM 7.2 Procedure for communication with
the RR-TAG: 6/0/0
ballot: 29 July 2018
ballot: 08 August 2018
documents: The UCC consultation, with some of our inputs:
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the
following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1