Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[STDS-802-11-ARC] FW: [802SEC] P802-REVc Working Group ballot recirc



--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 ARC Reflector ---

ARC folks,

 

The 802REVc recirculation ballot has now officially started.  See details below.

 

We (802.11 ARC) will be considering our response to this ballot on our teleconference on Aug 28 @ 2p ET.  Please join us, and please review the materials beforehand and come prepared with any comments you think we should submit.

 

Thanks.  Mark

 

From: ***** IEEE 802 Executive Committee List ***** <STDS-802-SEC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Glenn Parsons
Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2023 3:30 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [802SEC] P802-REVc Working Group ballot recirc

 

WG chairs,

 

With this message I would like to announce that I have initiated a working group recirculation ballot on P802-REVc ending on September 8th.   The intent is to have comment resolution meetings at the September interim session.

 

The announcement is attached and in the 802.1 email archive: 

https://www.ieee802.org/1/private/email2/msg35874.html

 

As confirmed during the November 2022 plenary, the working group ballot is following this process:

 

  1. The ballot is initiated in the 802.1 WG under the Maintenance TG and anyone is entitled to submit comments
    https://1.ieee802.org/maintenance/802-revc/
  2. The draft is in the 802.1 private area on grouper and privileges are set such that all 802 WG passwords grant access
    https://www.ieee802.org/1/files/private/802-REVc-drafts/d1/P802-REVc-d1.1.pdf
  3. Each WG chair is requested to conduct a comment collection using your WG process (for at least 15 days for a recirc). The WG chair is not expected to change the commenter's name, review the comments collected or have WG consensus
  4. Each WG chair is an ex-officio voting member and is requested to cast a ballot with the collected comments. The WG chair decides how they determine the vote on this ballot
  5. Ballot comment disposition may include an informational summary of comments/votes per WG
  6. The 802.1 recirc ballot is 30 days to give WG chairs sufficient time
  7. Each WG chair is requested to identify a representative to represent the submitted comments from that WG and/or the WG view dduring comment resolution.  
  8. Comment resolution will be conducted in dedicated meetings under the 802.1 Maintenance TG. Meeting announcements and discussion will happen on the Architecture list -- STDS-802-ARCH
    http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-ARCH&A=1

 

As a result I would ask the WG chairs to initiate comment collection on this draft in your WGs.

 

Please let me know if you have any questions.

 

Cheers,

Glenn.

--

Glenn Parsons

Chair, IEEE 802.1 WG

glenn.parsons@xxxxxxxxxxxx

+1-514-379-9037

 

 


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-SEC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-SEC&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-ARC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-ARC&A=1

--- Begin Message ---
Ballot due Aug. 19: P802.1Qdv/D0.3
For particulars see
 
https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501cfaf3-313273af-45444555433
1-6984a25685499dd2&q=1&e=15f3606b-3717-4c16-bd3b-c62d85f3951a&u=https%3A%2F%
2F1.ieee802.org%2Factive-ballots%2F
Working Group 802.1 Web pages:
https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501cfaf3-313273af-45444555433
1-1a52499692bb0fcf&q=1&e=15f3606b-3717-4c16-bd3b-c62d85f3951a&u=https%3A%2F%
2F1.ieee802.org%2F
802.1 list help:
https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501cfaf3-313273af-45444555433
1-b49326d84dbefc1f&q=1&e=15f3606b-3717-4c16-bd3b-c62d85f3951a&u=https%3A%2F%
2F1.ieee802.org%2Femail-lists%2F
-----

NOTE: ALL BALLOT RESPONSES SHOULD BE SENT TO THE NEW BALLOT RESPONSE LIST:

        STDS-802-1-ballot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

This Email is attached to an official 802.1 Working Group recirculation
ballot form for P802-REVc/D1.1 - Draft Standard for Local and metropolitan
area networks — Overview and Architecture. As this is a Working Group
ballot, only 802.1 voting members and ex-officio members are entitled to
vote. Each IEEE 802 WG chair (as an ex-officio 802.1 voting member) is
requested to collect and submit ballot comments on P802-REVc/D1.1 for their
WG during this Working Group ballot. This process is recommended so that the
WG chair vote can be recorded with the comments. The WG chair is not
expected to change the commenter’s name, review the comments collected or
have WG consensus. The WG chair decides how they determine the vote on this
ballot. However, any non-voting participants in the activities of 802.1 may
submit a "Comments Only" ballot on the draft. In accordance with established
practice in 802 and the IEEE, all comments received, whether from voters or
non-voters, are given due consideration during the Ballot resolution
process.

NOTE: As this is a formal WG ballot, if you vote "Approve" you are stating
that, in your professional opinion, you consider the document to be
technically complete, and ready for Standards Association ballot (i.e., the
document is essentially ready for publication, apart from final editing for
style, etc.). Hence, sending in an "Approve" ballot response within a small
number of minutes of the ballot start time cannot possibly mean that the
voter has given the document the level of professional consideration
necessary to make such a judgment.

As this is a recirculation ballot, some different rules apply:

- The balloting period is a minimum of 15 days.

- The subject matter of the ballot is NOT the entire document; the scope of
this ballot is ONLY those changes to the draft that were made in order to
resolve the ballot comments on the previous draft, any ballot resolutions
that may have been incorrectly applied, and any ballot comments that may
have been rejected.

- You need to return a ballot ONLY if you wish to change your previous vote
on P802-REVc. If you do not return a ballot, your previous vote will apply
unchanged.

- Responses are particularly solicited from those voters who made Disapprove
votes on the previous ballot, in order to confirm whether or not the agreed
ballot resolutions address their concerns. To put it more definitely, if you
are an 802.1 voting member who has submitted a previous Disapprove, we will
have to hound you until we receive a response.

The 802.1 voting members that are entitled to a vote on this ballot are as
follows (NOTE: for a WG ballot, the voting population is fixed at the start
of the ballot, and does not change during any subsequent recirculation
ballots, regardless of any membership changes over the course of the
balloting cycle):

Akizuki, Katsuyuki
Alexandris, Konstantinos
Arunarthi, Venkat
Assmann, Ralf
Bao, Huajie
Belliardi, Rudy
Boiger, Christian
Bottorff, Paul
Canchi, Radhakrishna
Chen, Feng
Choudhury, Abhijit
Congdon, Paul
Cummings, Rodney
Dorr, Josef
Elbakoury, Hesham
Engelmann, Anna
Farkas, Janos
Fedyk, Donald
Finn, Norman
Garner, Geoffrey
Gunther, Craig
Gutierrez, Marina
Haddock, Stephen
Hantel, Mark
Holness, Marc
Hopf, Daniel
Huh, Woojung
Itaya, Satoko
Ito, Yoshihiro
Karl, Michael
Kehrer, Stephan
Kiessling, Marcel
Lai, Gavin
Li, Yizhou
Lopes, Joao
Lv, Lily
Mangin, Christophe
Mansfield, Scott
Mater, Olaf
McCall, David
Mittelberger, Martin
Nakano, Hiroki
Nomura, Takumi
Obradovic, Dragan
Pannell, Donald R
Parsons, Glenn
Proell, Dieter
Randall, Karen
Riegel, Maximilian
Rodine, Craig
Rodrigues, Silvana
Rouyer, Jessy
Sato, Atsushi
Schewe, Frank
Seaman, Michael
Seewald, Maik
Sivakolundu, Ramesh
Specht, Johannes
Stamenic, Nemanja
Stanica, Marius
Steindl, Guenter
Traore, Karim
Turner, Max
Varga, Balazs
Venkatesan, Ganesh
Weber, Karl
Wessels, Leon
Winkel, Ludwig
Woods, Jordon
Yamaura, Takahiro
Zein, Nader

It should be noted that the ongoing retention of 802.1 voting rights is
predicated on active participation in Working Group ballots. Active
participation is defined to be returning ballot responses in two out of the
last three Working Group ballot series. A ballot series includes the initial
WG ballot and any subsequent recirculation ballots. The 802 WG Rules allow
abstention for any cause other than "lack of technical expertise" to be
treated as though it were a failure to respond to a ballot.

The closing date of this ballot is:

         8 September 2023

The PDF file of P802-REVc/D1.1 can be found at:

https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501cfaf3-313273af-45444555433
1-120dcc50d7c742f3&q=1&e=15f3606b-3717-4c16-bd3b-c62d85f3951a&u=https%3A%2F%
2Fwww.ieee802.org%2F1%2Ffiles%2Fprivate%2F802-REVc-drafts%2Fd1%2FP802-REVc-d
1.1.pdf

Comments should be made against the version of the draft above. There is
also a change bar draft at:

https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501cfaf3-313273af-45444555433
1-aab4e90647993a8e&q=1&e=15f3606b-3717-4c16-bd3b-c62d85f3951a&u=https%3A%2F%
2Fwww.ieee802.org%2F1%2Ffiles%2Fprivate%2F802-REVc-drafts%2Fd1%2FP802-REVc-d
1.1CMP.pdf

The YANG and MIB text files attached to the PDF.

The comment disposition for the previous ballot is here:

https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501cfaf3-313273af-45444555433
1-295be05721667a14&q=1&e=15f3606b-3717-4c16-bd3b-c62d85f3951a&u=https%3A%2F%
2Fwww.ieee802.org%2F1%2Ffiles%2Fprivate%2F802-REVc-drafts%2Fd1%2F1-23-0008-1
5-Mntg-802-revc-comments-wg-lb1-dis.pdf

If you have any difficulty downloading or reading this file, let me know.

As is normal with such ballots, comments should specify not only what
problems have been identified with the text, but also what the commenter
proposes as a solution.

Any comments accompanying the ballot must be presented using either of the
templates to be found here:

https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501cfaf3-313273af-45444555433
1-e26cfab7bf17aa60&q=1&e=15f3606b-3717-4c16-bd3b-c62d85f3951a&u=http%3A%2F%2
Fwww.ieee802.org%2F1%2Ffiles%2Fprivate%2Fcommenting-tool%2FMyBallot-tools%2F

Please ensure that you are using one of the latest templates referenced by
the link above, not a template from a prior ballot, and have completed the
Affiliation entry.

Comments can be generated using Excel or an equivalent spreadsheet program
that will read XLS or CSV format files. Attach the resultant file, in XLS or
CSV format, to your ballot response email. The editor would appreciate the
attached comment file clearly identify the commenter's name, project and
draft number. The following file name format is suggested:

     p802-revc-d1-1-comments-<yourname>.xls



RETURNING YOUR BALLOT FORM
==========================
Your ballot must be returned to:
STDS-802-1-ballot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

You are requested to use (exactly!) the appropriate Subject line from the
following set when returning your ballot. Please send your ballot with the
Subject line explicitly set, rather than using the Reply function in your
mailer.

P802-REVc/D1.1 - Approve
P802-REVc/D1.1 - Comments (with approve)
P802-REVc/D1.1 - Disapprove
P802-REVc/D1.1 - Comments (with abstain)
P802-REVc/D1.1 - Abstain
P802-REVc/D1.1 - Comments only

Your ballot must include the ballot form in the body and optionally an
attachment with comments.

Regards,
Glenn Parsons
Chair, IEEE 802.1 Working Group.

******************************
Ballot form follows.....
******************************
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: EMAIL ALL BALLOT RESPONSES ONLY TO:
STDS-802-1-ballot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
==========================
P802-REVc/D1.1 EMAIL BALLOT
==========================
TO: James Gilb, Editor, P802-REVc
SUBJECT:        P802-REVc/D1.1 - Draft Standard for Local and metropolitan
area networks — Overview and Architecture

_____ I Approve (may attach non-binding comments below)
_____ I Disapprove (must attach binding comments below)
_____ I Abstain for the following reasons (may attach non-binding comments
below):
_____ Lack of Time
_____ Lack of Expertise
_____ Other: _______________________________

____________________________________________
(Name)
____________________________________________
(Affiliation)
---------------------------------------------------------------------

INCLUDE COMMENTS ONLY AS AN ATTACHMENT, USING THE TEMPLATES IDENTIFIED
ABOVE. IF THERE IS NO AFFILIATION IN THE TEMPLATE, IT IS THE WRONG ONE!

===
Unsubscribe link: mailto:STDS-802-1-L-SIGNOFF-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
IEEE. Fostering technological innovation and excellence for the benefit of
humanity.

--- End Message ---