Re: [STDS-802-11-CAC] End game of TGah

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Hello Adrian,

If the game can be ended on this year, we have no problem!

One question;
In the previous CAC call, Dorothy commented that all WG motion for EC report will be placed on the Wednesday mid plenary agenda.
But, if the TG motion for approving the next sponsor ballot is planned after the Wednesday mid plenary, the WG motion for EC report (TGi and TGah) should be postponed to the Friday closing plenary?

If it is yes, TGah likes to complete all comment resolution before Wednesday plenary. But, an assumption is that TGai shall be on the same phase as well... I don't know what is a plan of TGai.

Thanks,

Yongho

2016-09-02 2:01 GMT-07:00 Adrian Stephens <adrian.p.stephens@xxxxxxxx>:

Dear Yongho and Alfred,

I have just spoken with Marc Emmelmann. He indicates that TGai D10 contains
some editing typos in the baseline update that effect technical changes.

We therefore have to plan for TGai producing a D11 to fix these typos.

This impacts TGah because you will need to produce a D10 to incorporate only
a change to the cited TGai version number.

We have some options here:
1. Argue with the IEEE-SA staff that this is an editorial change and submit to RevCom with D9.
2. Cancel the current recirculation ballot and start a new one when TGah D10 is available.
3. Complete the current recirculation ballot, and start a new one when TGah D10 is available.

There is time to do 3, and it is the safest option. Please see attached plan.
So I propose this is what we do.

Do you have any comments about this process?

--
Best Regards,

Adrian Stephens
IEEE 802.11 Working Group Chair
mailto: adrian.p.stephens@xxxxxxxx
Phone: +1 (971) 203-2032
Skype: adrian_stephens

IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand.