--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Chairs' Advisory Committee Reflector ---
G’day Jon
I though of that, but the two sessions really need to go in order for context, and it is more important for the second session to avoid clashes.
There is no perfect answer. If we have to clash then we will manage it, but I would prefer to avoid the clash if TGme is happy to move.
Andrew
From: *** IEEE stds-802-11-cac List *** <STDS-802-11-CAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Behalf Of Jon Rosdahl
Sent: Thursday, 22 April 2021 9:22 AM
To: STDS-802-11-CAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-CAC] COEX/REVme session conflict on May 14
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Chairs' Advisory Committee Reflector ---
Would adding Coex SC to
Monday May 17 - PM2 ( 4-6pm ET) be an option?
Doesn't conflict with any TG and does not require any TG to move.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Rosdahl Engineer, Senior Staff
IEEE 802 Executive Secretary Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
office: 801-492-4023 10871 North 5750 West
cell: 801-376-6435 Highland, UT 84003
A Job is only necessary to eat!
A Family is necessary to be happy!!
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Chairs' Advisory Committee Reflector ---
G’day Mike
There have been developments …
I have been working with Coex SC participants on the Coex SC agenda overnight
-
It seems the that Coex SC has lots of material for May, including
-
ETSI BRAN update
-
NB FH coexistence in 6 GHz
-
60 GHz coexistence
-
Most of this can be handled in the existing Wed PM2 session
-
However, an extra session is needed to focus on how 802.11be and 802.11ax can operate (well) in the context of the newly agreed ETSI BRAN adaptivity rules in both 5 GHz and 6 GHz
-
This session will be of particular interest to TGbe and TGme
-
Time zone challenges mean that Thu PM2 is probably the only feasible slot
-
So I would like to propose
-
Coex SC keep its Wed PM2 session
-
This clashes with TGme
-
It is not ideal that it clashes with TGme but it is manageable
-
Coex SC adds a Thu PM2 session
-
This also clashes with TGme
-
This is definitely not ideal because the Coex SC topic is likely to be of importance to TGme, and a regular TGme participant will be driving discussions to Coex SC
-
TGme move its Thu PM2 session
Andrew
Hi everyone,
Andrew alerted me to a discussion in Co-ex which potentially conflicts with REVme during Wednesday PM2. At this point, I don't know what topics we will be covering in REVme for
that session (other than comment resolution).
I could request that we move the TGme session to Monday May 17 from 4-6pm ET, but I thought we could discuss this and come to a conclusion on Monday's call.
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-CAC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-CAC&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-CAC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-CAC&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-CAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-CAC&A=1
|