Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-CAC] motion request

--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Chairs' Advisory Committee Reflector ---

Hello, Stephen and Dorothy, 


Please see the TGbd motion text below:


Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB 251 on P802.11bd D1.0 as contained in document https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-1887-10-00bd-tgbd-lb251-comments.xlsx , instruct the TGbd editor to create P802.11bd D2.0 and approve a motion request during July plenary meeting to WG11 for approval of a 20-day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P802.11bd D2.0 be forwarded to SA Ballot?”


TGbd vote: Moved: Rui Cao,  Seconded: Stephan Sand, Result: 12y-0n-0a



Please note that the original motion in TGbd is as below, and the approved CRs in motion #1 have been incorporated into 11-20/1887r10 which contains approved comment resolutions for all LB 251 comments.

 

Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB 251 on P802.11bd D1.0 as contained in document 

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-1887-09-00bd-tgbd-lb251-comments.xlsx  (to be updated), and approved in Motion #1 in 11-21/0904r1

Instruct the TGbd editor to create P802.11bd D2.0 and approve a motion request during July plenary meeting to WG11 for approval of a 20-day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P802.11bd D2.0 be forwarded to SA Ballot?”

TGbd vote: Moved: Rui Cao,  Seconded:  Stephan Sand

Result: 12y-0n-0a


Best Regards,

Bo



Original Mail
Sender: sun bo10013985
To: DorothyStanley;
CC: STDS-802-11-CAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
Date: 2021/05/29 10:01
Subject: Re:[STDS-802-11-CAC] motion request

Hello, Dorothy, 


Thanks very much for your thinkful re-wording and suggestion.


Understanding the risk and difficulty to run an electronic WG11 motion, the intention of original motion 21 is for the TGbd to approve the editor to generate D2.0 and approve a request to WG11 to run WG11 motion for a 15 day WG recirculation LB during Jul plenary meeting (your suggested scenario plan 6). As you point out, there will be one month gap between the generation D2.0 and a 15-day recirculation in this case. TGbd could take the time to start discussion of known issues. The discussion will not be in a CR format but will help on the following D2.0 comment resolution development. 


So the motion 21 may be modified as:

a.       Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB 251 on P802.11bd D1.0 as contained in document https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-1887-09-00bd-tgbd-lb251-comments.xlsx  (to be updated),

b.      Instruct the TGbd editor to create P802.11bd D2.0 and

c.       Approve a motion request during July plenary meeting to WG11 for approval of a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P802.11bd D2.0 be forwarded to SA Ballot?”

d.      TGbd vote: Moved: <name>,  Seconded: <name>, Result: y-n-a


Your further suggestion is appreciated.


Best Regards,

Bo


Sender: DorothyStanley
To: STDS-802-11-CAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
Date: 2021/05/29 01:54
Subject: Re:[STDS-802-11-CAC] motion request
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Chairs' Advisory Committee Reflector ---

Hello Bo,

Regarding draft motion 21:
“Move to allow the tech editor to generation IEEE P802.11bd D2.0 based on D1.0 and approved comment resolutions to LB 251 comments, and start a 15-day recirculation LB when D2.0 is ready.”,

please see the suggested re-wording of the motion in list item 1 below, together with a discussion of the motions/process.
I understand that the intent is to prepare P802.11bd D2.0 and send D2.0 to a 15 day WG recirculation LB.

I approve conducting the reworded motion 21, along the lines of the motion text in item 1 below. (The version of the comment resolution spreadsheet will likely need to be updated.)
I just want to make sure the group understands that if they pass motion 1 below now (June),
that both an electronic WGLB approval motion and the WGLB will follow.

Let me know of any questions.


Thanks,

Dorothy

===========================================


1.       TGbd Motion

a.       Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB 251 on P802.11bd D1.0 as contained in document https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-1887-09-00bd-tgbd-lb251-comments.xlsx ,

b.      Instruct the TGbd editor to create P802.11bd D2.0 and

c.       Request WG11 approval of a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P802.11bd D2.0 be forwarded to SA Ballot?”

d.      TGbd vote: Moved: <name>,  Seconded: <name>, Result: y-n-a

 

2.       Anticipating TGbd approval of the above motion, the next step is a motion in the WG to approve conducting the WGLB on P802.11bd D2.0. This is the motion that would normally be held in the WG11 closing plenary, and is distinct from the WGLB itself.

 

3.       WG11 motion – would be conducted electronically (propose 10 days), requires a response rate of 50% of the 442 WG11 Voting members, and 75% approval.

a.       Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB 251 on P802.11bd D1.0 as contained in document https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-1887-09-00bd-tgbd-lb251-comments.xlsx,

b.      Instruct the TGbd editor to create P802.11bd D2.0 and

c.       Approve a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P802.11bd D2.0 be forwarded to SA Ballot?”

d.      Moved by Bo Sun on behalf of TGbd

e.      TGbd vote: Moved: <name>,  Seconded: <name>, Result: y-n-a


4.       Assuming that the WG motion in list item 3 passed, I would then open the 15 day WGLB on P802.11bd D2.0, asking the question “Should P802.11bd D2.0 be forwarded to SA Ballot?”

5.       Looking at the timeline (assuming all motions pass):

a.       June 8 - TGbd approval motion

b.      June 8-18 - 10 day electronic motion for WG approval of conducting the recirculation ballot

c.       June 19 to July 3  - 15 day WGLB on P802.11bd D2.0 (assumes June 19th availability of D2.0)

d.      July 12 to 20 - July Plenary electronic meeting

 

6.       For scenario planning, if TGbd comment resolution goes beyond June 8, an alternate timeline, assuming approval of TGbd and W11 motions at the July Plenary and availability of TGbd D2.0 on July 21 is below.  The difference is one month: July 3 to August 5 to have comments back on D2.0.

a.       July 19 TGbd D2.0 WGLB approval motion

b.      July 20 WG approval of conducting the D2.0 recirculation ballot

c.       July 21-August 5 WGLB on P802.11bd D2.0



On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 9:09 AM Dorothy Stanley <dstanley1389@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello Bo,

Thanks for these draft motions.

Slide 20 motion - Approved, no issue.

Slide 21 motion - requires a longer response, will respond to this motion in a subsequent email shortly.

Dorothy

On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 6:57 PM Bo Sun <sun.bo1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
--- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Chairs' Advisory Committee Reflector ---

Hello. Dorothy, 


Following the 10-day rule, I'd like to request 2 motions on slide 20 and slide 21 in the attached agenda doc in Jun 8 TCbd TC. 


I'll upload the agenda doc after you approve the motion request.



Best Regards,

Bo





To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-CAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-CAC&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-CAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-CAC&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-CAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-CAC&A=1