Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

[STDS-802-11-TGAF] Draft treatment of VHT PPDU

To: STDS-802-11-TGAF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGAF] Draft treatment of VHT PPDU
From: Matthew Fischer <mfischer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 20:44:40 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <01fe01cd644f$3458a0f0$9d09e2d0$@lee@lge.com>
List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-802-11-TGAF>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-802-11-TGAF>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAF-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAF-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAF-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
References: <0793F4AC2152E24E804A32C4867A50DA02F6ED@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <01fe01cd644f$3458a0f0$9d09e2d0$@lee@lge.com>
Reply-to: Matthew Fischer <mfischer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: "*** 802.11 TGaf - TV White Spaces OperationTask Group ***" <STDS-802-11-TGAF@xxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AQHNZFz8gY+NIaKsB0GtNR7lALgaLQ==
Thread-topic: Draft treatment of VHT PPDU

Is there a TVHT PPDU?

Do we need to change, in clause 9, occurrences of VHT PPDU to “VHT PPDU or TVHT PPDU”?

Or do we assume that occurrence of VHT PPDU are sufficient to describe behavior for a TVHT STA, since a TVHT STA is a VHT STA?

Matthew Fischer

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAF] Draft treatment of VHT PPDU
  - From: Ron Porat

Next by Date:
Next by thread: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAF] Draft treatment of VHT PPDU
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread