Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAF] 12/1017r52 posted with SB0 comments

[Yongho Seok <yongho.seok@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Peter,

 

I would volunteer the following comments resolution.

- 5059, 5093, 5139, 5140, 5141, 5142, 5144, 5062, 5073, 5076, 5134, 5145, 5143, 5137

 

Thanks,

Yongho

 

2013/9/13 Peter Ecclesine (pecclesi) <pecclesi@xxxxxxxxx>

Hi All,

 

R51 adds Sponsor Ballot 0 comments

R52 corrects the SB CID numbering to match the Access Database. There are no CIDs 5006 or 5011 in IEEE-SA results.

 

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/12/11-12-1017-52-00af-tgaf-wg-lb-comment-resolutions.xlsx

 

SB 0 Draft 5.0 cumulative
E		71	MultiProposed	Needs submission	Ready for motion	Review	Approved	Withdrawn	Unready
G		7
T		65
GEN		10	0	0	0	0	0	0	10	Unvolunteered GEN	10
MAC		30	0	0	0	0	0	0	30	Unvolunteered MAC	23
PHY		38	0	0	0	0	0	0	38	Unvolunteered PHY	34
EDITOR		65	0		0	0	0	0	65	Unvolunteered, non-Editor	67
Total		143	0	0	0	0	0	0	143	Unready	100.0%
										CAQ	0
										CSM	0
										GDC	0
									GEN	PHY	0
										WSM	0

 

   We are asking for comment resolution volunteers, please reply to the list.

 

Thanks in advance,

 

petere

Peter Ecclesine, Technology Analyst

MS SJ-14-4 170 West Tasman Dr, San Jose, CA 95134-1706

Ph 408/527-0815, FAX 408/525-9256

"Time doesn't fool around."  "Without Prejudice" U.C.C. 1-207