| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
If the group agrees with the principle of the comment and proposed change, the question is whether the commenter’s proposed resolution is unambiguous or not. If the group believe it is unambiguous, they should indicate an “accepted” resolution. If they do not do this, they are being lazy, and are forcing the commenter to refer to the submission and determine if they are happy with the resolution. I strongly object to “revised – see document xyz” when laziness is the reason. Thanks for your support, Adrian. In the particular comment cited, the proposed change is unambiguous and there is no reason for a “revised”. For the avoidance of doubt, the comment cited was just an example. I believe a number of other resolutions should be "accepted" too, and those which look like they should be but aren't should say why they aren't (e.g. the commenter missed one instance, or referred to the wrong location, etc.). Mark -- Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600 Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS Fax: +44 1223 434601 ROYAUME UNI WWW: http://www.samsung.com/uk From: Stephens, Adrian P [mailto:Adrian.P.Stephens@xxxxxxxxx]
Hello Mark and TGai, I’ll weigh in with some commentary. If the group agrees with the principle of the comment and proposed change, the question is whether the commenter’s proposed resolution is unambiguous or not. If the group believe it is unambiguous, they should indicate an “accepted” resolution. If they do not do this, they are being lazy, and are forcing the commenter to refer to the submission and determine if they are happy with the resolution. I strongly object to “revised – see document xyz” when laziness is the reason. In the particular comment cited, the proposed change is unambiguous and there is no reason for a “revised”. Best Regards, Adrian P STEPHENS Tel: +44 (1793) 404825 (office) Tel: +1 (408) 2397485 (mobile, USA) ---------------------------------------------- From: *** 802.11 TGai - Fast Initial Link Set-Up *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAI@xxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Mark Rison Hello Jae Seung, Thank you for these resolutions. None of them are "accept", but a number of the "revised" ones don't indicate why they were not just "accept"s. Just picking one example:
For all the proposed resolutions like this, i.e. which are "revised" but don't indicate why the change proposed by the commenter couldn't just be accepted, please specify what the difference is between the change proposed by the commenter and the change you propose. Thanks, Mark -- Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600 Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS Fax: +44 1223 434601 ROYAUME UNI WWW:
http://www.samsung.com/uk From: *** 802.11 TGai - Fast Initial Link Set-Up *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAI@xxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of ??? Dear all, I revised two documents:
- 11-14/1498r1, LB 204 Resolution to Some CIDs on Clause 8.4.2.173
Best Regards, /Jason (Jae Seung) 보낸 사람 :
"이재승" <jasonlee@xxxxxxxxxx> Dear all, The following two documents have been uploaded for the comment resolution.
- LB 204 Resolution to Some CIDs on Clause 8.4.2.173 I want to present these documents on Wednesday PM1. Best Regards, /Jason (Jae Seung) _______________________________________________________________________________
IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at
hand. SELF SERVICE OPTION: Point your Browser to -
http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAI
and then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector press the LEAVE button.
Further information can be found at:
http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html
_______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________
IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand.
SELF SERVICE OPTION: Point your Browser to -
http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAI and then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector press the LEAVE button.
Further information can be found at:
http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand.
SELF SERVICE OPTION: Point your Browser to -
http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAI and then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector press the LEAVE button.
Further information can be found at:
http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________
IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand. SELF SERVICE OPTION: Point your Browser to - http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAI and then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector press the LEAVE button. Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________ |