Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAI] Two comment resolution documents have been uploaded



If the group agrees with the principle of the comment and proposed change,

the question is whether the commenter’s proposed resolution is unambiguous or not.

If the group believe it is unambiguous,  they should indicate an “accepted” resolution.

If they do not do this,  they are being lazy,  and are forcing the commenter to

refer to the submission and determine if they are happy with the resolution.

I strongly object to “revised – see document xyz” when laziness is the reason.

 

Thanks for your support, Adrian.

 

In the particular comment cited,  the proposed change is unambiguous and

there is no reason for a “revised”.

 

For the avoidance of doubt, the comment cited was just an example.

I believe a number of other resolutions should be "accepted" too,

and those which look like they should be but aren't should say why

they aren't (e.g. the commenter missed one instance, or referred to

the wrong location, etc.).

 

Mark

 

--

Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN   English/Esperanto/Français

Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre       Tel: +44 1223  434600

Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS      Fax: +44 1223  434601

ROYAUME UNI                             WWW: http://www.samsung.com/uk

 

From: Stephens, Adrian P [mailto:Adrian.P.Stephens@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 5 November 2014 23:12
To: Mark Rison; STDS-802-11-TGAI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGAI] Two comment resolution documents have been uploaded

 

Hello Mark and TGai,

 

I’ll weigh in with some commentary.

 

If the group agrees with the principle of the comment and proposed change,

the question is whether the commenter’s proposed resolution is unambiguous or not.

If the group believe it is unambiguous,  they should indicate an “accepted” resolution.

 

If they do not do this,  they are being lazy,  and are forcing the commenter to

refer to the submission and determine if they are happy with the resolution.

I strongly object to “revised – see document xyz” when laziness is the reason.

 

In the particular comment cited,  the proposed change is unambiguous and

there is no reason for a “revised”.

 

 

 

Best Regards,

 

Adrian P STEPHENS

 

Tel: +44 (1793) 404825 (office)
Tel: +44 (7920) 084 900 (mobile,  UK)

Tel: +1 (408) 2397485 (mobile, USA)

 

----------------------------------------------
Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
Registered No. 1134945 (England)
Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
VAT No: 860 2173 47

 

From: *** 802.11 TGai - Fast Initial Link Set-Up *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAI@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Rison
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 4:59 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGAI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAI] Two comment resolution documents have been uploaded

 

Hello Jae Seung,

 

Thank you for these resolutions.

 

None of them are "accept", but a number of the "revised" ones don't indicate

why they were not just "accept"s.  Just picking one example:

 

The width of the PHY Support Criteria subfield is 3, not 2.

Change the width of PHY Support Criteria subfield in the Figure 8-574e to 3.

Revised -

 

Agree with the commenter.

 

TGai Editor to make changes shown in 14/1498r1

 

For all the proposed resolutions like this, i.e. which are "revised"

but don't indicate why the change proposed by the commenter couldn't

just be accepted, please specify what the difference is between the

change proposed by the commenter and the change you propose.

 

Thanks,

 

Mark

 

--

Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN   English/Esperanto/Français

Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre       Tel: +44 1223  434600

Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS      Fax: +44 1223  434601

ROYAUME UNI                             WWW: http://www.samsung.com/uk

 

From: *** 802.11 TGai - Fast Initial Link Set-Up *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAI@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ???
Sent: 5 November 2014 15:59
To:
STDS-802-11-TGAI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAI] Two comment resolution documents have been uploaded

 

Dear all,

 

I revised two documents:

 


- 11-14/1497r1, LB 204 Resolution to Some CIDs on Clauses 10.1.4.3.2, 10.1.4.3.4, and 10.1.4.3.5

 

- 11-14/1498r1, LB 204 Resolution to Some CIDs on Clause 8.4.2.173

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/11-14-1498-01-00ai-lb-204-resolution-to-some-cids-on-clause-8-4-2-173.doc


Just some minor changes were made to rev.0.

 

Best Regards,

/Jason (Jae Seung)

 


보낸 사람 : "이재승" <jasonlee@xxxxxxxxxx>
보낸 날짜 : 2014-11-05 23:58:42 ( +09:00 )
받는 사람 :
STDS-802-11-TGAI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11-TGAI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
참조 :
제목 : [STDS-802-11-TGAI] Two comment resolution documents have been uploaded

Dear all,

 

The following two documents have been uploaded for the comment resolution.

 


- LB 204 Resolution to Some CIDs on Clauses 10.1.4.3.2, 10.1.4.3.4, and 10.1.4.3.5

 

- LB 204 Resolution to Some CIDs on Clause 8.4.2.173

 

I want to present these documents on Wednesday PM1.

 

Best Regards,

 

/Jason (Jae Seung)

 

_______________________________________________________________________________

IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand.

SELF SERVICE OPTION: Point your Browser to - http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAI and then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector press the LEAVE button.

Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand.

SELF SERVICE OPTION: Point your Browser to - http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAI and then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector press the LEAVE button.

Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand.

SELF SERVICE OPTION: Point your Browser to - http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAI and then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector press the LEAVE button.

Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

IF YOU WISH to be Removed from this reflector, PLEASE DO NOT send your request to this CLOSED reflector. We use this valuable tool to communicate on the issues at hand.

SELF SERVICE OPTION: Point your Browser to - http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAI and then amend your subscription on the form provided. If you require removal from the reflector press the LEAVE button.

Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________