Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAX] TGax Draft D0.2



Hello Robert,

Thanks for resolving a lot of editorial comments.
Regarding the resolution of CID 2416, I have one concern.

2416While converting 11-16/24r1 word doc to PDF file, Gamma_{k_BW}=1 was lost. Fix it as specified in 11-16/24r1.
I.e., In HE modulated fields, Gamma_{k_BW}=1 in all the subcarriers.
As per commentREJECTED (EDITOR: 2016-05-11 17:45:08Z) - Gamma^k_BW = 1 was removed editorially since it was contradicted by subsequent equations for specific values of BW.

It seems that removed word is not contracted with the subsequent equation.
"is used to represent a rotation of the tones. In HE modulated fields, in all the subcarriers. In pre-HE modulated fields, BW in Gamma^k_BW is determined by the TXVECTOR parameter CH_BANDWIDTH as defined in Table 2614."
As you can see, first sentence is referring the HE modulated fields and second sentence is referring the pre-HE modulated fields. All subsequent equations are defining the Gamma^k_BW values in Table 26-14.

If you still think that it is a technically contradicted wording, could you reassign it to a technical comment? Because the your changed wording from D0.1 is still incomplete sentence.

Thanks a lot,
Yongho.
 
2016-06-07 8:44 GMT-07:00 Stacey, Robert <robert.stacey@xxxxxxxxx>:

Hello All,

 

The associated comment spreadsheet is: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/16/11-16-0535-05-00ax-comments-on-tgax-d0-1.xlsx

 

Two of the tabs in the spreadsheet are “Technical in D0.2” and “Editorials in D0.2”. These list comments that were addressed in this draft revision.

 

-Robert

 

From: *** 802.11 TGax - HEW - High Efficiency WLAN *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Osama AboulMagd
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 2:18 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGAX] TGax Draft D0.2

 

Hello All,

 

Draft D0.2 is now available in the member area.

 

Draft D0.2 includes the resolutions of the 200+ comments approved in May. I also believe Robert has covered some of the editorial comments.

 

Please review.

 

Regards;

Osama.

 

$

_______________________________________________________________________________

If you wish to be removed from this reflector, do not send your request to this reflector - it will have no effect.

Instead, go to http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX and then press the LEAVE button.

Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________

If you wish to be removed from this reflector, do not send your request to this reflector - it will have no effect.

Instead, go to http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX and then press the LEAVE button.

Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________


_______________________________________________________________________________

If you wish to be removed from this reflector, do not send your request to this reflector - it will have no effect.

Instead, go to http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX and then press the LEAVE button.

Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html _______________________________________________________________________________