|
Hi Kaiying,
There's nothing new with regards to this compared to D1.0, just a clarification of the spec text.
These rules were there already.
Thanks
Laurent
Sent from my iPhone
Hi Laurent，
I have deep concerns about the CR for section 27.9.2.2 spatial reuse as shown in previous email below. I would like to have a change to discuss it F2F. Unfortunately I can not attend the Wednesday Ad-hoc meeting.Would you kindly
consider to postpone your presentation and straw poll to tomorrow?
Thank you very much!
吕开颖 Lv Kaiying
Hi Laurent,
Thanks for preparing the CR for section 27.9.2.2 spatial reuse.
I have one clarification question on the new defined "OBSS PD SR opportunity"
OBSS PD SR opportunity: A time period that starts when a STA regards an OBSS PPDU as not received at all with the OBSS_PD SR procedure, and that ends at the end of the TXOP that the STA gains once its backoff reaches zero.
During this periods, the STA follows specific rules, as defined in 27.9.2.2.
How about this case? The backoff starts when a STA regards an OBSS PPDU as not received at all with the OBSS_PD SR procedure,however the backoff reaches zero after one or multiple OBSS TXOP terminate. Is this TXOP still belonging to the defined OBSS_PD SR opportunity?<mime-attachment.gif>
In this example you gave in the proposal, the SR TXOP starts before the OBSS TXOP S1’ ends. What about the example that the TXOP starts after the OBSS TXOP S1’ ends?
Thanks for your further clarification!
吕开颖LvKaiying
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
If you wish to be removed from this reflector, do not send your request to this reflector - it will have no effect.
Instead, go to http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX and then press the LEAVE button.
Further information can be found at: http://www.ieee802.org/11/Email_Subscribe.html
_______________________________________________________________________________
|
