| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi all, Please see the link below for the latest comment spreadsheet of D4.0. https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/19/11-19-0292-19-00ax-comments-on-tgax-d4-0.xlsx I updated the resolution based on the record in 19/983r6. Please let me know if I miss anything. PS. I observe some error for several CIDs. After discussing with chair, we treat these CIDs as not motioned, and the chair will review the action in the teleconference call. Please see the details
below. Observation: ·
CR Motion #877: CID 21506 is included in the CID list of 11-19/0417r8, but this is an error because CR Motion #881 specifically says 21506 is deferred.
·
CR Motion #927: 21325 and 21326 are part of the motion CID list, but resolutions of CID 21325 and CID 21326 cannot be found in 19/1137r1. ·
CR Motion #928: CID 20779 is included in the CID list, but 11-19/1336r3 only reviews 20799.
Action for now: ·
Treat CID 21506 as not motioned because 11-19/0417r8 does not have any resolution for CID 21506. ·
Treat CID 21325 and 21326 as not motioned
·
Treat CID 20799 as not motioned but still implement the change in 11-19/1336r3 since all the change made by CID 20799 are tagged by another motioned CID.
·
11-19/1336r3 does not have any change tag with CID 20779, so I treat that Motion 928 has no effect for CID 20779. Best, Po-Kai To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1 |