Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hello Mark Please see my response inline Best wishes Ming Gan 发件人: *** 802.11 TGax - HEW - High Efficiency WLAN *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
代表
Mark Rison Just kind remind, I send a request to the Chair.
If you have suggestion, please tell me. Regarding 20/0980r3: - I attach my comments again. - I am probably OK with option 3 as long as Alfred (or anyone else) can explain why ack+TRS needs to be forbidden unless MU cascading is supported. - However, Tomo-san's point about whether
1. The AP triggers STA 1 and STA 2.
2. STA 1 and STA 2 transmit Data that solicits ack to the AP.
3.
AP transmits ack + TF to STA 1 and STA 2 again. The ack is for the Data that STA 1 and STA 2 transmitted. The TF is to let STA 1 and STA 2 continue UL MU transmission.
4. STA 1 and STA 2 transmit Data that solicits ack to the AP.
is cascading or not needs to be agreed on [Ming] I have no idea for this.
- The changes actually shown in 20/0980r3 are not correct: * They don't effect option 3 *
in this figure the HE MU PPDUs contain a triggering frame and a Data or Management frame which solicits an immediate acknowledgement, and the HE TB PPDUs contain an
Ack or BlockAck frame and a Data or Management frame which
solicits an immediate acknowledgement. (#CID 20732, 20733 and 21450) should be: in this figure the second HE MU PPDU contains an Ack or BlockAck frame and a triggering
[or Trigger, depending on the Tomo-san point outcome] frame. [Ming] Does the second HE MU PPDU contain Data frame? This is just an example, I do not see any issue for the original sentence. Please point it out if any. * The A-MPDU may additionally contain one or more MPDUs and is constructed following the rules in 26.6 (A-MPDU operation in an HE PPDU). should be: The A-MPDU may contain other MPDUs, subject to the rules in 26.6 (A-MPDU operation in an HE PPDU). [Ming] any difference between “additionally ” and “other”? if they are the same, I would like to keep it. Regarding CID 24557 in 20/0981r4: - I attach my comments again. - I'm not persuaded by the PN assignment for the retransmitted fragment shall follow the rules defined in 12.5.3.3.2 (PN processing) except that the PN shall be incremented in steps of 1 for
the retransmitted fragment if it has a different body length from the previously transmitted fragment * I'm not sure we can guarantee that another frame hasn't been transmitted (to the given receiver) with the PN specified here (incremented by 1), i.e. that PN might already have been used. Can we guarantee this? [Ming] It can be guaranteed because it has the following description in
12.5.3.3.2 (PN processing) The PN shall never repeat for a series of encrypted MPDUs using the same temporal key. * 12.5.3.3.2 is for CCMP, but we also need to support GCMP. [Ming] Good catch. Actually there are two sub clause of PN processing. One is 12.5.3.3.2 (PN processing) in CCMP and the other
is 12.5.5.3.2 PN processing in GCMP. So I would like to change it to “the PN assignment for the retransmitted fragment shall follow the rules defined in 12.5.3 (CTR with CBC-MAC protocol (CCMP)) and 12.5.5
(GCM protocol (GCMP)) except that the PN shall be incremented in steps of 1 for the retransmitted fragment if it has a different body length from the previously transmitted fragment and is encrypted” * the DU might not be encrypted [Ming] What is the DU? Is this related If there is no better proposal from e.g. Jouni then how about something generic and safe like: If the MSDU, A-MSDU or MMPDU is encrypted, and the retransmitted fragment has a different length from the
previous fragment, the PN shall be greater than any PN previously used for transmissions to the receiver. NOTE—This is to ensure that requirements on non-reuse of a PN with the same temporal key are met (see 12.5.3.3.2
and 12.5.5.3.2). [Ming] “Greater” is not good since the baseline says “The PN is incremented by a positive number for each MPDU. The PN shall be incremented in steps of 1 for constituent MPDUs of fragmented MSDUs and MMPDUs.”
NOT “the MSDU, A-MSDU or MMPDU is encrypted”,
it is MPDU (or fragment) is encrypted ? Thanks, Mark --
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600 Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS Fax: +44 1223 434601 ROYAUME UNI WWW:
http://www.samsung.com/uk From: Ganming (Ming) <ming.gan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Just kind remind, I send a request to the Chair.
If you have suggestion, please tell me. We need to finalize it this week as Osama mentioned before that all the CIDs for D6.0 should be resolved . Once it is decided, hope no similar
comment again. Best wishes, Ming Gan 发件人:
Ganming (Ming) Hello Osama Could you add the 981/r4 (1 CID) and 980/r3 to the agenda? Thank you. Best wishes, Ming Gan 发件人:
*** 802.11 TGax - HEW - High Efficiency WLAN *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
代表
Osama AboulMagd Hello All, TGax CRC has a conference call scheduled for Thursday August 20 @ 20:00 ET; for 3 hours. I’ve uploaded a tentative agenda. It is available at:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-1169-09-00ax-tgax-crc-teleconference-agendas-august-september-2020.pptx
I believe submissions are available covering all (or most) the remaining 34 comments.
•
Call the meeting to order
•
IEEE-SA IPR policy and procedure
•
Attendance. Please record your attendance on IMAT (imat.ieee.org).
•
Please add [V} and [NV] beside your name on Webex
•
Motions (Candidate CIDs are listed in the next page)
•
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-0665-08-00ax-comment-resolution-on-mibs-and-pics.docx
- Edward Au - CID 24209
•
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-0981-03-00ax-mac-cr-on-fragmentation-for-draft-6-0.doc
- Ming Gan - CID 24557
•
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-1218-02-00ax-d6-0-misc-cr.docx - Robert Stacey
•
Discussion on CID 24102 – Lili Hervieu
•
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-0980-02-00ax-mac-cr-on-mu-cascading-for-draft-6-0.doc
- Ming Gan
•
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-1233-00-00ax-the-last-of-the-cids-plan-b.docx
- Alfred Asterjadhi
•
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-1235-00-00ax-11ax-d6-0-comment-resolution-of-cid-24043.docx
- Liwen Chu
•
AoB
•
Adjourn Webex info:
https://ieeesa.webex.com/ieeesa/j.php?MTID=md5b4ae2b2b5d1c90c6da910ee7cced49 Meeting number: 129 383 1701
Meeting password: wireless (94735377 from phones and video systems)
Join by phone: Tap to call in from a mobile device (attendees only)
+1-408-418-9388 USA Toll Access code: 129 383 1701 Teleconferences are bound by the conditions stipulated by the documentation below. Please review them and bring up any questions/concerns you may have before proceeding with the teleconference • IEEE Code of Ethics https://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html • IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) Affiliation FAQ https://standards.ieee.org/faqs/affiliation.html • Antitrust and Competition Policy https://standards.ieee.org/content/dam/ieee-standards/standards/web/documents/other/antitrust.pdf • IEEE-SA Patent Policy http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/sect6-7.html https://standards.ieee.org/about/sasb/patcom/ • IEEE 802 Working Group Policies &Procedures (29 Jul 2016) http://www.ieee802.org/PNP/approved/IEEE_802_WG_PandP_v19.pdf • IEEE 802 LMSC Chair's Guidelines (Approved 13 Jul 2018 https://mentor.ieee.org/802-ec/dcn/17/ec-17-0120-27-0PNP-ieee-802-lmsc-chairs-guidelines.pdf • Participation in IEEE 802 Meetings https://mentor.ieee.org/802-ec/dcn/16/ec-16-0180-05-00EC-ieee-802-participation-slide.pptx • IEEE 802.11 WG OM: (Approved 10 Nov 2017) https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/11-14-0629-22-0000-802-11-operations-manual.docx Regards;
Osama. To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1 |