Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Ross, Given that 80MHz “segment” and “segment parser” is used for a long time and people understand the concept well, not sure we need to change the terminology now. Since 160MHz has 1 segment, there is a de-parser for 160MHz. And frequency subblock is also not necessarily better than frequency segment IMO. BRs, Xiaogang. From: *** 802.11 TGax - HEW - High Efficiency WLAN *** <STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Behalf Of Yujian (Ross Yu) Retry. Sorry if you have received it twice. regards 于健 Ross Jian Yu Huawei Technologies 发件人:
Yujian (Ross Yu) Hi Brian and all, There is one comment from Brian saying segment parser is not a good term for 160MHz PPDU because there is only one segment for 160MHz PPDU. Subblock parser is a better wording. Technically I agree with Brian. The only concern is that this
is a procedure/term used since 11ac. Currently I make the changes as Brian suggested. All your comments are welcome.
There are also 3 other comments that are also assigned to me. Your comments are also welcome. Below please find the link to the document. https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-1528-00-00ax-sig-b-cr-on-d7-0.doc regards 于健 Ross Jian Yu Huawei Technologies To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1 |