Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Thanks for these resolutions.
Some comments: Mu Cascading:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-1646-00-00ax-mac-cr-on-mu-cascading-for-draft-7-0.doc 25058: I'm not sure about the change w.r.t. the proposed change. The receivers of an MU PPDU are the same as the transmitters of the immediately following TB PPDUs, except for the corner cases of no-ack MPDUs, corruption and CS Required denial, etc., but this is not a special feature of cascading, it's always the case. Also, you don't need "within the same
TXOP" since the whole para is about "In an MU cascading sequence",
though if you wanted to say "Within an MU cascading sequence"
I'd be OK. 25075: I'm not sure about the proposed additional requirement for a non-AP STA to check the AP's MU Cascading Support subfield before responding to an MU PPDU from the AP.
If the AP can't cope with MU cascading, it should not trigger a STA for a cascading transmission. (Also editorially "it transmit" -> "it transmits" (2x)) In the first para below Discussion… Word is showing a change bar, but I can't work out what is being changed.
What is being changed here? Fragment:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-1647-00-00ax-mac-cr-on-fragmentation-for-draft-7-0.doc 25109: the proposed change is better; you cannot have "shall" in a NOTE. 25110/25111: these are the same comment with different proposed changes, one for each of the possible interpretations.
In the resolution it would be better to say which is the correct interpretation.
(Seems it's "1) for a dynamic fragment containing a Management frame, you can only have one in the A-MPDU"?) 25112: the problem with saying "shall also support level 1 dynamic fragmentation" is that it's not clear: do you support level 1 dynamic fragments at the same time as level 2/3 dynamic fragments, or is it just that you have L1 support if the peer doesn't support L2/L3?
I think the proposed change is better. 25115: I am not 100% sure "so
that the PN never repeats for the same temporal key" is correct.
I agree that's what md/D5.0/12.5.3.3.1/a)1) suggests, but on the other hand 12.5.3.1 indicates only reuse of a TK with the same nonce is an issue, and as 12.5.3.3.4 shows the nonce includes the UP, so maybe the PN can repeat for the same TK as long as it's for a different UP?
+Jouni here; the proposed wording is:
The frame body length and contents of the retransmitted fragment shall be the same as the initially
transmitted fragment and shall remain fixed for the lifetime of the MSDU, A-MSDU or MMPDU at that STA except when all the fragments preceding the initial transmitted fragment were received and all the fragments following the initial transmitted fragment have
either explicitly failed or have not been transmitted, in which case the frame body length and contents of the retransmitted fragment may be different from the initially transmitted fragment and the PN assignment for the retransmitted fragment shall follow
the rules defined in 12.5.3.3.2 (PN processing) and 12.5.5.3.2 (PN processing)
except that the PN shall be incremented for the retransmitted fragment so that the PN never repeats for the same temporal key (#CID 25115) if it has a different body length from the previously transmitted fragment and is encrypted. Thanks, Mark P.S.: As regards "could you add the tile for 26.6, like 26.6
(A-MPDU operation in an HE PPDU)?" I think it appears automatically in drafts and disappears automatically in the final published document. --
Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN English/Esperanto/Français Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre Tel: +44 1223 434600 Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS Fax: +44 1223 434601 ROYAUME UNI WWW:
http://www.samsung.com/uk From: *** 802.11 TGax - HEW - High Efficiency
WLAN *** <STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Ganming (Ming) Hello all, I uploaded two CR documents to the server, please refer to the following link, comments are welcome Fragment:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-1647-00-00ax-mac-cr-on-fragmentation-for-draft-7-0.doc Mu Cascading:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-1646-00-00ax-mac-cr-on-mu-cascading-for-draft-7-0.doc Best wishes Ming Gan 发件人:
*** 802.11 TGax - HEW - High Efficiency WLAN *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
代表
Ganming (Ming) Hello Osama, Is the meeting time
Tuesday October 20 @ 10:00 ET based on the calendar of 802.11? Best wishes Ming Gan 发件人:
*** 802.11 TGax - HEW - High Efficiency WLAN *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGAX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
代表
Osama AboulMagd Hello All, TGax CRC has a conference call scheduled for Tuesday October 20 @
17:00 ET; for 2 hours. Please let me know if you plan a submission. A draft agenda is available at:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-1552-10-00ax-tgax-crc-teleconference-agendas-october-november-december-2020.pptx
Webex Info:
https://ieeesa.webex.com/ieeesa/j.php?MTID=mfb526d03f3e9ec7b8b28fe7a78faf086
Meeting number: 173 002 9529
Meeting password: wireless (94735377 from phones and video systems)
Join by phone: Tap to call in from a mobile device (attendees only)
+1-408-418-9388 USA Toll Teleconferences are bound by the conditions stipulated by the documentation below. Please review them and bring up any questions/concerns
you may have before proceeding with the teleconference • IEEE Code of Ethics https://www.ieee.org/about/corporate/governance/p7-8.html • IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) Affiliation FAQ https://standards.ieee.org/faqs/affiliation.html • Antitrust and Competition Policy https://standards.ieee.org/content/dam/ieee-standards/standards/web/documents/other/antitrust.pdf • IEEE-SA Patent Policy http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/sect6-7.html https://standards.ieee.org/about/sasb/patcom/ • IEEE 802 Working Group Policies &Procedures (29 Jul 2016) http://www.ieee802.org/PNP/approved/IEEE_802_WG_PandP_v19.pdf • IEEE 802 LMSC Chair's Guidelines (Approved 13 Jul 2018 https://mentor.ieee.org/802-ec/dcn/17/ec-17-0120-27-0PNP-ieee-802-lmsc-chairs-guidelines.pdf • Participation in IEEE 802 Meetings https://mentor.ieee.org/802-ec/dcn/16/ec-16-0180-05-00EC-ieee-802-participation-slide.pptx • IEEE 802.11 WG OM: (Approved 10 Nov 2017) https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/14/11-14-0629-22-0000-802-11-operations-manual.docx Regards; Osama. To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAX list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAX&A=1 |