| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hello Assaf: Thanks for following up – I understand the rationale. I do think that ‘mutually’ does not quite convey the rationale. I do not have a better suggestion, however. We will leave it for now; and if we can come up with a more crisp and clear description fix it at a later time. Cheers -- ganesh From: *** 802.11 TGaz - NGP - Next Generation Positioning *** <STDS-802-11-TGAZ@xxxxxxxx>
On Behalf Of Assaf Kasher Hi All, During the conference call in 10/10/18 I mentioned mutually direction measurement capable DMG STAs. The question came up as to why we need to define whether device are “mutually
direction measurement capable”. The answer is that the capabilities field has 4 capability bits: AOD TX, AOD RX, AOA TX and AOA RX. In order to have a useful exchange, we need one device to have a TX capability
if the other device has an RX capability, and they shall also match in the AOA/AOD sense. Therefore, it is not enough to have one capability bit set (as the current text has), but it has to be a matching bit in the 2 devices. This is the reason for defining
“mutual” capability. Best Regards, Assaf To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAZ list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAZ&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAZ list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAZ&A=1 |