Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAZ] Asking for reassigning of TGaz LB240 CIDs address

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 9:55 AM Erik Lindskog <e.lindskog@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Assaf,

Thanks!

Roy, Can you reassign CIDs 1542, 1543, 1544 to me?

Best Regards,

Erik

From: Assaf Kasher [mailto:akasher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 11:26 PM
To: Erik Lindskog <e.lindskog@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Christian Berger <crberger@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Debashis Dash <ddash@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Das, Dibakar <dibakar.das@xxxxxxxxx>; ganesh.venkatesan@xxxxxxxxx; yongho.seok@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Roy Want <roywant@xxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGAZ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; chaochun.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Segev, Jonathan <jonathan.segev@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Asking for reassigning of TGaz LB240 CIDs addressing TB Ranging features that also applies to Passive Location Ranging

I have not issue reassigning these CIDs to Erik

Assaf

From: Erik Lindskog <e.lindskog@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 11:50 PM
To: Assaf Kasher <akasher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Christian Berger <crberger@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Debashis Dash <ddash@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Das, Dibakar <dibakar.das@xxxxxxxxx>; ganesh.venkatesan@xxxxxxxxx; yongho.seok@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Roy Want <roywant@xxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGAZ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; chaochun.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Segev, Jonathan <jonathan.segev@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Asking for reassigning of TGaz LB240 CIDs addressing TB Ranging features that also applies to Passive Location Ranging

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization.

Assaf, Christian, Debashis, Dibakar, Ganesh and Yongho,

Would it be OK if we reassigned the following CIDs of yours to me?

Assaf: 1542, 1543, 1544

Christian: 1531, 1532, 1536, 1537, 1538, 1539, 1540, 1545, 1560

Debashis: 1551, 1552, 1553, 1554, 1555, 1556, 1574

Dibakar: 1535, 1568

Ganesh: 1520

Yongho: 1561, 1562

These are all CIDs that comment on the need to specify that some TB Ranging feature or behavior also applies to Passive Location Ranging.

My thinking is to rather than in each of these cases specify that these TB Ranging specifications also applies to Passive Location Ranging, instead improve upon our general statement that what applies to TB Ranging also applies to Passive Location Ranging, and where applicable rather specify what TB Ranging features does not apply to Passive Location Ranging, e.g. secure ranging and the ISTA to RSTA LMR reporting. This should save us a whole lot of text.

Best Regards,

Erik

From: Roy Want [mailto:roywant@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 1:33 PM
To: Erik Lindskog <e.lindskog@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: STDS-802-11-TGAZ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ChaoChun Wang (王超群) <chaochun.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Segev, Jonathan <jonathan.segev@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Asking for reassigning of TGaz LB240 CIDs addressing TB Ranging features that also applies to Passive Location Ranging

Erik,

The way we've been handling the reassignment requests is to identify the primary for each CID you are requesting, and negotiate with them whether you can take primary ownership. If they agree, send me the CID list for transfer from that person, and I'll update the spreadsheet. You can use 11-19/413r3 to guide you on the current assignee. When you have all your answers I'll make the update on 11-19/413r4, and then I'll coordinate with Chao-Chun to update the main database.

Does this work for you?

--Roy

__________________________

Roy Want

Google Android
Location & Context Team

MTV-43-299E, Cell: 650 691 3600

www.roywant.com/cs

On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 11:13 AM Erik Lindskog <e.lindskog@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Roy and all,

May I suggest we reassign/assign the TGaz LB240 CIDs:

1520, 1523, 1524, 1528, 1529, 1530, 1531, 1532, 1535, 1536, 1537, 1538, 1539, 1540, 1542, 1543, 1544, 1545, 1547, 1548, 1551, 1552, 1553, 1554, 1555, 1556, 1560, 1561, 1562, 1564, 1565, 1568, 1574, 1579

to me.

These are all CIDs that comment on the need to specify that some TB Ranging feature or behavior also applies to Passive Location Ranging.

My thinking is to rather than in each of these cases specify that these TB Ranging specifications also applies to Passive Location Ranging, instead improve upon our general statement that what applies to TB Ranging also applies to Passive Location Ranging, and where applicable rather specify what TB Ranging features does not apply to Passive Location Ranging, e.g. secure ranging and the ISTA to RSTA LMR reporting. This should save us a whole lot of text.

Best Regards,

Erik

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAZ list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAZ&A=1

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAZ] Asking for reassigning of TGaz LB240 CIDs addressing TB Ranging features that also applies to Passive Location Ranging