Thank you Qi,
Roy, if you can please make that change.
Best,
Jonathan
From: qi_wang2@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:qi_wang2@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2019 16:33
To: Segev, Jonathan <jonathan.segev@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: STDS-802-11-TGAZ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGAZ] 11az LB#240 comment assignement
Hi Jonathan,
Debashish Dash just replied that he is oaky with the re-assignment of CID 2298, 2299, 2300, 2305, 2306 per my request. In addition, Dibakar Das has previously agreed to the re-assignment
of CID 2307, and Erik Lindskog with CID 2302. It is my hope that the re-assignment will facilitate the resolution of these comments.
Thank you Qi for clarifying,
Giving this is the case we will leave the assignee for those CIDs as is.
In general members are encouraged to collaborate and work together such that the submissions they’re bringing are in consensus and not conflict each other in
terms of text.
However as a committee member you can make any submission you may want including to CIDs not assigned to you.
If more than a single submission is adopted and touches on same text to the extent the technical editor cannot resolve it (happened in the past will happen in
the future), the technical editor will reject the submissions
and return them to the group.
I have reached out to Debashish Dash via email twice about the comment re-assignment, but have not heard back from him.
Regarding the group of comments that were assigned to Christian, I have gone through the LB 240 comment database and found all the comments (some are submitted by me, and some are by others) affecting specific parts of the 11az, so that
the re-assignment of these comments would not create any conflict of Christian’s work to resolve other comments. I communicated the detailed CID information (topic, affected spec part, etc) to Christian, but he prefers to remain to be the assignee of these
comments.
I will make the submissions to resolve these comments. I hope we can be collaborative in the process. If it turns out that multiple submissions are made on the resolution of the same CID, the task group can decide which one to adopt (or
not adopt) through voting. This has been done in the past by other technical task groups, and most recently, in 11ax.
Thank you for volunteering.
I requested the group to have a single point of contact for each CID such that it is easy to manage.
If you discussed reassignment with Christian and Debashish and they are interested in reassigning to you from them this is just fine – let’s us and those will
be reassigned to you.
If not, we will leave as is as the assignment was done on a “first come first served” basis.
Would you please add me as a co-assignee to the following comments? These CIDs were assigned to Christian Berger in Vancouver. I will bring submissions to resolve them, and will work with Christian as much as possible in the process.
CID: 2278, 2280, 2283, 1113, 2275, 2276, 2277, 2278, 2279, 2280, 1654, 1220, 2431, 1126, 2295, 2296, 2297, 2281, 2303, 2310, 2311
Would you please also add me as a co-assignee to the following comments? These CID were assigned to Debashish Dash in Vancouver. He has not responded to my email about the CID re-assignment.
Again, I will bring submissions to resolve them, and will work with Debashish as much as possible in the process.
CID 2298, 2299, 2300, 2305, 2306.
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGAZ list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGAZ&A=1
|