| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Mark, Is there any reason for introducing the term “dual-band”? Back in the 11ad/11mc days, we had quite a bit of discussion on the use of such terms. We avoided using terms like “dual-band”, but instead decided
to use “multi-band”. Architecturally, a STA has a single MAC and PHY entities. To refer to any box that has more than a single MAC and PHY entity, the 802.11 standard uses the term “multi-band device” (several occurrences of this term in 802.11-2016). Thanks, Carlos. From: *** 802.11 TGba - WUR- Wake-up Radio Operation *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGBA@xxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Mark Hamilton All, (CC: TGba, just FYI, for those who have undying interest…) I have uploaded updates to my discussion documents with proposed architecture (reference models) for WUR-capable AP and non-AP STAs, and the state machine view of WUR operation. I think I captured the comments made on the last ARC teleconference.
And, these are now pasted as embedded Visio objects within a Word file, so hopefully they will upload and download correctly. These can be found here:
-
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/18/11-18-1017-01-0arc-wur-multi-ap-reference-model.docx
-
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/18/11-18-1016-02-0arc-wur-state-diagram-proposal-hamilton.docx We (the ARC SC) can review these at the F2F in July (San Diego), and decide what to present/discuss with TGba in our joint session on Thursday PM2. Mark To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBA list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBA&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBA list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBA&A=1 |