Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBA] TGba motions on Thursday PM2

[Suhwook Kim <suhwook.kim@xxxxxxx>]

Dear Minyoung,

 

Alfred and I discussed and removed the conflicts.

For Group ID support, I divide encoding into non-AP STA and AP part. There wouldn’t be conflict with Alfred’s CR.

For Protection frame support, it doesn’t tough technical meaning, so we believe that editor can handle it.

 

I have uploaded revised my CR document, and my first motion text should be changed as follow.

 

Move to accept the comment resolution in [11-19/0047r23] for the CIDs listed below:

[10 CIDs: 69, 70, 166, 368, 514, 879, 1016, 1101, 1230, 1231]

 

Move: Suhwook Kim

Second: Eunsung Park

 

Thanks,

Best,

Suhwook Kim

From: *** 802.11 TGba - WUR- Wake-up Radio Operation *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGBA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Minyoung Park
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 11:26 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBA] TGba motions on Thursday PM2

 

Thanks Rojan. 

 

Suhwook and Alfred, could you please look into this and remove the conflicts?

 

Thanks,

Minyoung

 

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 6:17 PM <rojan.chitrakar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Minyoung,

 

The changes to encoding of Group ID Support and Protected WUR frame support in “Table 9-318a-Subfields of the WUR Capabilities Information field” are in conflict. One proposes separate capabilities of AP and non-AP, while the other proposes unified capabilities.

 

Best regards,

Rojan Chitrakar

 

From: Minyoung Park [mailto:mpark.ieee@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 11:07 AM
To: Rojan Chitrakar <rojan.chitrakar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: STDS-802-11-TGBA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBA] TGba motions on Thursday PM2

 

Hi Rojan,

 

Could you please elaborate more on which parts are conflicting? also CIDs?

 

Thanks,

Minyoung

 

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 5:54 PM Rojan Chitrakar <rojan.chitrakar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Alfred,

For 18/2130r4 and 18/2131r2, noticed that the revised encoding for the Group ID Support and Protected WUR frame support WUR Capabilities conflicts with the resolution in 19/47r2. Perhaps you guys want to harmonize?

Best regards,
Rojan Chitrakar

-----Original Message-----
From: *** 802.11 TGba - WUR- Wake-up Radio Operation *** [mailto:STDS-802-11-TGBA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alfred Aster
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 9:56 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBA] TGba motions on Thursday PM2

Hello Minyoung,

Please find some motions from my side:

1) Move to accept the comment resolutions in 11-18/1835r3 for all the CIDs listed in the document.

2) Move to accept the comment resolutions in 11-18/2129r0 for all the CIDs listed in the document.

3) Move to accept the comment resolutions in 11-18/2130r4 for all the CIDs listed in the document.

4) Move to accept the comment resolutions in 11-18/2131r2 for all the CIDs listed in the document.

5) Move to accept the comment resolutions in 11-18/2162r4 for all the CIDs listed in the document.

Regards,

Alfred

________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBA list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBA&A=1

________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBA list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBA&A=1

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBA list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBA&A=1

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBA list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBA&A=1