| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Thank you both for the thorough review. I agree with all the suggestions, except one. In 29.9.1, the deletion of “existing” is not because of any redundancy, but rather because in the context of this paragraph and sentence, there is no TFS agreement mentioned, that could be an “existing” TFS set. All this paragraph says is that if the AP and STA support TFS, then they can use it for the listed WUR frames. They are not re-using anything, nor is anything “existing”. I would suggest we delete both the words “reuse existing”. Mark From: *** 802.11 TGba - WUR- Wake-up Radio Operation *** <STDS-802-11-TGBA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Huang, Po-kai Hi Yunsong, Thanks for the review. Comments and suggestions look reasonable. I will revise accordingly. Best, Po-Kai From: Yunsong Yang <yunsongyang1@xxxxxxxxx> Hi Po-kai and Minyoung, Thank you for preparing the draft RC for CID 8001 in doc. 11-20-1596r0. Attached please find my comments and proposed changes. Thanks. BR, Yunsong Yang To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBA list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBA&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBA list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBA&A=1 |