| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Mark, Thanks for the feedback. The reference for 11.22.12 is about “support traffic filtering service (TFS) as specified”. You may support but do not establish any traffic filtering agreement. I think that to avoid the confusion
the following “established …” description will be useful. I assume that this should address your comment, so I will go with this revision.
Best, Po-Kai From: mark.hamilton2152 <mark.hamilton2152@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks Po-Kai. That would be fine. Or, since the reference to 11.22.12 is already there, we may not need the new text about "established according ...". But, you're correct about inserting "use" where I deleted "reuse". Thanks. Mark -------- Original message -------- From: "Huang, Po-kai" <po-kai.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 10/12/20 11:42 AM (GMT-07:00)
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBA] comment on doc. 11-20-1596r0
Hi Mark, I see your point. I can revise like below to bring the agreement to avoid any confusion.. If a WUR AP and an associated WUR non-AP STA support traffic filtering service (TFS) as specified in 11.22.12 (TFS Procedures), then the WUR AP and the WUR non-AP STA may
use the Best, Po-Kai From: *** 802.11 TGba - WUR- Wake-up Radio Operation *** <STDS-802-11-TGBA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Behalf Of Mark Hamilton Thank you both for the thorough review. I agree with all the suggestions, except one. In 29.9.1, the deletion of “existing” is not because of any redundancy, but rather because in the context of this paragraph and sentence, there is no TFS agreement mentioned, that
could be an “existing” TFS set. All this paragraph says is that if the AP and STA support TFS, then they can use it for the listed WUR frames. They are not re-using anything, nor is anything “existing”. I would suggest we delete both the words “reuse existing”. Mark From: *** 802.11 TGba - WUR- Wake-up Radio Operation *** <STDS-802-11-TGBA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Behalf Of Huang, Po-kai Hi Yunsong, Thanks for the review. Comments and suggestions look reasonable.
I will revise accordingly. Best, Po-Kai From: Yunsong Yang <yunsongyang1@xxxxxxxxx>
Hi Po-kai and Minyoung, Thank you for preparing the draft RC for CID 8001 in doc. 11-20-1596r0. Attached please find my comments and proposed changes. Thanks. BR, Yunsong Yang To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBA list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBA&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBA list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBA&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBA list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBA&A=1 |