Hi Mike,
How do we represent an Rx-only STA in the PICS section?
Regards,
Abhi
From: M Montemurro <montemurro.michael@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2022 11:20 AM
To: Abhishek Patil <appatil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: STDS-802-11-TGBC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBC] TGbc: Mandating DL negotiations procedure
WARNING:
This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.
Hi Abhi,
I agree with your assessment. We could make the condition mandatory on a STA that is not an RX-only STA.
Cheers,
Mike
On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 12:35 PM Abhishek Patil <appatil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Xiaofei, All,
As discussed during today’s TGbc call, the framework allows an rx-only STA to receive EBCS content.
Therefore, I have some concern with tagging the DL negotiations procedures as mandatory in the PICS section.
I’m initiating this thread for us to have an offline discussion on the topic.
I have copied a snapshot of pg 106:
Regards,
Abhi
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBC&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBC&A=1