Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBD] LB 259 CR CID 3002 and 3052 in 11-22/0007r4

Hi Stephan,

Thanks a lot for working on this. It's quite complicated, and I don't pretend to understand all of it.

I like what you've provided to us.  One area where I see a potential for confusion is with respect to the words "with the following differences" in this sentence: 

An NGV Ranging NDP Announcement frame (9.3.1.19 (VHT/HE/Ranging NDP Announcement frame format)) is transmitted instead of a VHT/HE/Ranging NDP Announcement frame.with the following differences in the subfields of the STA Info fields:


I want to be as clear as possible what we say these are differences from. I think this means that 9.3.1.19 specifies the frame format and the contents of the subfields for the general case, and we're going to specify different subfield contents for some, but not all, of the fields for the NGV case.  My small suggestion is to break this into two sentences so we don't have to invoke 9.3.1.19 twice in the same sentence (I'm not showing change tracking):
  • A Ranging NDP Announcement frame (9.3.1.19 (VHT/HE/Ranging NDP Announcement frame format)) is transmitted. The following differences in the subfields of the STA Info fields apply compared to the specification in 9.3.1.19. 
I'm not sure, but to me that is slightly clearer for the reader.  If you disagree, please go ahead with your current wording.

The only other comment is that the number 32 was inadvertently copy/pasted into the first bullet of the 11.21.6.4.4.2 insertion:
  • An ISTA transmitting a Ranging NDP Announcement frame shall not use a bandwidth 32 wider than that indicated by an RSTA in the Ranging Parameters field, in the IFTM frame. 
I believe 32 is a line number in the 11az text from which this was copied.

Thanks,
John




On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 2:57 PM Yujin Noh <Yujin.Noh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Stephan,

 

Thank you for sharing the update.

Would you please add the following text in the resolution box in CID3002?

  • TGbd editor: Editorial modification allowed to fix unnecessary capitalization under CID 3056 in DCN 22/0016r2

 

Regards,

Yujin

 

From: Stephan Sand <stephan.sand@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 10:59 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBD] LB 259 CR CID 3002 and 3052 in 11-22/0007r4

 

**BE CAUTIOUS** THIS EMAIL ORIGINATED FROM OUTSIDE SENSCOMM. DO NOT CLICK ANY LINKS OR OPEN ATTACHMENTS UNLESS YOU RECONGNIZE THE SENDER AND KNOW THE CONTENTS ARE SAFE. ALSO BE CAUTIOUS WHEN ‘REPLYING TO ALL’.

Hi Bo, Yujin, Joseph, John, Liwen, all,

 

Thanks for todays feedback on CIDs 3002 and 3052!

 

I have uploaded 11-22/0007r4 on mentor moving the changes from 9.3.1.19 to 31.4:

 

Please review the changes under CID3002 and provide me your feedback by Thursday end of business. I will then present the latest revision in the telco on Friday if time permits.

 

Best regards,

 

Stephan

 

 

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBD list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBD&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBD list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBD&A=1



--
John Kenney
Director and Sr. Principal Researcher
Toyota InfoTech Labs
465 Bernardo Avenue
Mountain View, CA 94043
Tel: 650-694-4160. Mobile: 650-224-6644

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBD list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBD&A=1