| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Sameer, Thanks for quick response and suggestions. I am fine with all of your suggestion. I will update SPs accordingly. Will wait for more discussion before upload revision 3. SP#1
•
Do you support that U-SIG in each 80MHz shall carry puncturing channel info for at-least the specific 80MHz where it is transmitted?
–
Note1: Each STA needs to decode U-SIG in only one 80MHz segment
–
Note2: Within each 80MHz segment, U-SIG is duplicated in every non-punctured 20MHz
–
BW/Puncturing info can be different for different 80MHz
–
Whether BW and puncturing info bits in U-SIG are carried as a combined or a separate field is TBD
SP#2
•
Do you agree to have STA-ID related information in an EHT PPDU sent to a single user? Best regards, Wook Bong Lee From: Sameer Vermani [mailto:svverman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Thanks Wook Bong for this harmonization attempt. I overall agree with the ideas in your straw-polls. I have two minor comments which you might want to consider:
Regards, Sameer From: Wook Bong Lee <wookbong.lee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of
the organization. Hi PHY fans, This is an email to discuss straw poll for SU SIG contents in 11-20/285. During 3/18 conference call, there was a request to discuss straw poll using e-mail reflector. If you are not interested in this topic, sorry for this e-mail.
First, Eunsung asked to defer the straw poll since he has some more puncturing pattern to propose, and it may impact the signaling design.
Eunsung’s contribution was discussed 3/18 call, and there was no agreement to add more puncturing pattern. Second, after I review following two contributions,
I agreed with some of ideas in those contributions, i.e. allowing a STA to know exact what is puncturing pattern for the 80MHz. I believe this is useful not only for a different STA to camp different 80MHz (note this feature itself needs more discussion in MAC Adhoc or in Joint group) but also for a non-associated STA to decode FILS or Unsolicited Probe Response
frame in MU PPDU which is supported in 11ax for 6GHz operation. So, I modified SP accordingly. In addition to that, we want to propose to include STA-ID related information in SU PPDU as well to aid non-STR STA for MLD operation. Please refer 11-20/285 or 11-19/1405r7, “Multi-link Channel Access Discussion” for more discussion.
These are proposed SPs in 11-20/285r2. Uploaded revision 2 in the server. SP#1
•
Do you support that U-SIG in each 80MHz shall carry puncturing channel info for at-least the specific 80MHz where it is transmitted?
–
Note1: Each STA needs to decode U-SIG in only one 80MHz segment
–
Note2: Within each 80MHz segment, U-SIG is duplicated in every non-punctured 20MHz
–
BW/Puncturing info can be different for different 80MHz
–
TBD: separate BW and puncturing info bits in U-SIG SP#2
•
Do you agree to have STA-ID related information for SU PPDU in EHT-SIG? If you have any question or any suggested modification, please let us know. Best regards, Wook Bong Lee To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |