Hi Junghoon,
The passed SP for BCC is also a joint interleaving, right? It is just bit-interleaving. So both tone interleaving for LDPC and bit interleaving for BCC are
joint interleaving. So I did not see any problem for the passed SP:
Do you support joint interleaving for RU and aggregated RU size <=80 MHz?
Thanks,
Jianhan
From: Junghoon Suh [mailto:Junghoon.Suh@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 9:26 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Candidate SFD text contributions for inclusion to TGbe SFD: Call for Review - Reminder
Hello, Alfred
I’d like to ask to change the Straw-poll (SP) text for the following SP.
In the SFDr11 Page 12, Section 2.3.3. and Line 28,
Do you support joint interleaving for RU and aggregated RU size <=80 MHz?
In 802.11, Interleaver is usually for bit-based interleaving of the BCC encoded bits, and Tone Mapper is for the QAM-Symbol
based tone-mapping of the LDPC encoded and Constellation Mapped QAM-symbols.
Since the SP above is targeted for the Large size RU/MRU and LDPC, I’d like to request to change the SP text as following.
Do you support Joint Tone Mapper for RU and aggregated RU with the size less than or equal to 996 tones?
Thank you
Regards
Junghoon
From: Alfred Asterjadhi [mailto:asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: April 29, 2020 11:58 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Candidate SFD text contributions for inclusion to TGbe SFD: Call for Review - Reminder
This is a reminder that the final call for review for the items below (related to REV8 of document 11-20-566) will be during
tomorrow's Joint call.
If you have any comments and/or questions please let me know.
Our TGbe Editor has prepared the Rev 8 of the compendium of SPs and potential changes to the SFD, which can be found below:
This is a call for members to review the new SFD text contributions (which are highlighted in
yellow and identified by tags listed as [DCN (Presentation, Author, Affiliation), ...] SP#X, ...) in the compenidum of SPs document.
Please do send an e-mail in response to this Call For Review if you would like to identify any of these "new SFD text contributions" as contributions that need further discussion.
A list of these requested contributions will be queued for discussion in next week's Joint conference call (a member can also ask for further discussion for a particular text contribution during the call itself).
New SFD text contributions that have not received a request for further discussions will be marked in
green in the compendium document and will be ready for a WG motion later on.
If you have any comments and/or questions please let me know.
--
Qualcomm Technologies Inc.
Office #: +1 858 658 5302
--
Qualcomm Technologies Inc.
Office #: +1 858 658 5302
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
*********** MEDIATEK Confidentiality Notice ***********
The information contained in this e-mail message (including any
attachments) may be confidential, proprietary, privileged, or
otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. It is
intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). Any
use, dissemination, distribution, printing, retaining or copying
of this e-mail (including its attachments) by unintended recipient(s)
is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not an
intended recipient of this e-mail, or believe that you have received
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately
(by replying to this e-mail), delete any and all copies of this
e-mail (including any attachments) from your system, and do not
disclose the content of this e-mail to any other person. Thank you!
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
|