Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Contribution 463r1

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Hi Osama,

Thanks for your comment. I understand that TID values from 8-15 are used for TSIDs but is it not true that the Trigger-based approach is different than EDCA-based channel access? Also TID values 14 and 15 serve as special indicators ( All/BlockAck) in .ax although they are in TSIDs.

Regards,

_Subir

From: Osama AboulMagd <Osama.AboulMagd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 2:44 PM
To: Das, Subir <sdas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Contribution 463r1

Hi Subir,

I couldn’t make my comment during the teleconference because of an audio problem.

For the TID field the values 0-7 are used for UP and the values 8-15 are used for traffic stream ID (TSID) defined for HCCA operation. This way you are actually proposing to use an already defined value.

It is true that perhaps there are no HCCA implementations. However the fact remains that TSID are still defined in 802.11 spec.

Regards;

Osama.

From: Das, Subir [mailto:sdas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 1:53 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Contribution 463r1

Hello All,

Thanks for your comments during the presentation today. I responded to some folks in chat window and will work with others.

I would like to see if folks are okay with the SP language since I didn’t get much time to discuss this.

# SP1 :

Do you support the addition of following text to TGbe SFD?

The NS/EP Priority Service non-AP STAs shall use a TID value >7 in QoS Control Field in its buffer status report as a response to BSRP Trigger Frame to indicate the need for priority access to AP STA

Note: The identification of the need is outside the scope of this specification.

Thanks,

_Subir

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1