Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Comments on "0755 Non-STR AP"
Hi Jinjing,
Thank you for the presentation. I just had few clarification questions:
1. Per this proposal, legacy STAs (that are more likely to be 5 GHz versus 6 GHz in short run) will be parked in basic links while EHT STAs on the conditional link. Now, assuming the 5 GHz link is more congested, the chances of winning channel access for 5 GHz link may be small. Since you are further constraining yourself to transmit on the conditional link only after winning the channel access on the basic link, this means the performance gain for the EHT STA is pretty limited. Looking at the proposal, I am not sure why this constraint is even needed.
2. Is it assumed that UL for the EHT STA is only Trigger based ?
3. The proposal seems to be suggesting a PIFS-based channel access on conditional link after winning channel access on basic link. Is that correct ?
Regards,
Dibakar
-----Original Message-----
From: Jinjing Jiang <jinjing@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 5:17 PM
To: George Cherian <gcherian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Zhou Lan <zhou.lan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; liyunbo@xxxxxxxxxx; Das, Dibakar <dibakar.das@xxxxxxxxx>; Cariou, Laurent <laurent.cariou@xxxxxxxxx>; Srinivas Kandala <srini.k1@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Yongho Seok <Yongho.Seok@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; liwen.chu@xxxxxxx; Rui.Yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Comments on "0755 Non-STR AP"
Dear all,
Due to the time constraints at the conference call, I was not able to collect all the comments and answer questions on the Non-STR AP contribution.
Please kindly share your thoughts through this thread, I will try to answer.
Thanks and best regards,
Jinjing
________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1