Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] SP-3 408r5

[Chunyu Hu <chunyuhu07@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi, Dmitry:

Good question. Yes or No. 

As explained in the contribution, we think it's necessary to exercise some set of management/policies and channel access rules that are different from regular traffic (versus latency sensitive traffic). Hence the differentiation among links.

If we don't have such a definition, we may eventually come up with something like "a link where certain operations and configurations are conducted to optimize for latency sensitive applications" every time we need to mention such a link.

The intention of the SP is to provide such a term.

Please let me know if you or anyone has further questions.

Thanks.

Chunyu

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 3:17 PM Akhmetov, Dmitry <Dmitry.Akhmetov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Chunyu,

 

I have a general question – what changes in your contribution if you don’t have a definition of “Latency Sensitive link”?

 

You slide 9 says:

• Define an operating mode in MLO, where
• AP MLD, based on association and traffic dynamics, can steer latency sensitive traffic over a subset of links using a suitable configuration (details TBD)

 

If AP see TSN traffic(s) it , in first place, have to have a tool/mechanism  to either steer/group such traffic(s) in one link or steer non-TSN traffic to another link.

Example#1 on slide 26 seems to confirm that. Even more, in this example links at the beginning

 

It won’t matter at the end if such link named as “Just link” or “Latency Sensitive Link”, right?

 

 

Dmitry

 

From: Chunyu Hu <chunyuhu07@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 2:47 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] SP-3 408r5

 

Hi, Dibakar,

 

Thanks for the correction. It should be "AP MLD" indeed.

I will fix the text and upload r6.

 

Thanks.

Chunyu

 

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 2:31 PM Das, Dibakar <dibakar.das@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Chunyu,

 

I had a question on the SP text. The SP says:

“A definition of Latency Sensitive Link in Multi-Link Operation as a link over which the AP defines TBD QoS mechanisms to provide the latency sensitive traffic streams improved latency and reliability performance”

 

Do you mean an “AP” or an “AP MLD” ?

 

Regards,

Dibakar

 

From: Chunyu Hu <chunyuhu07@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 10:54 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 答复: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] TGbe Teleconference [06/22/2020: Agendas Posted

 

Hi, Alfred:

 

Can you add SP3 / DCN11-20-408r5 to the MAC meeting agenda? It's latency related, and we deferred last time.

 

Thanks.

Chunyu

 

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1