Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] IEEE802.11be D0.1 Spec Text Writing: Volunteers Assignment

Hello Chunyu,

Thanks for your confirmation on the location of #SP49 in subclause 6.8 of the SFD.   I will not move it to subclause 6.10 per your comment.

re your question, it is a good suggestion.  Since Alfred is asking POCs on a particular topic to send him and me with a list of motions that are expected to covered by that topic, I will wait for this action item to be completed before aligning the sub-items with the SFD.

Regards,
Edward


On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 2:47 PM Chunyu Hu <chunyuhu07@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I see. I think this motion will be reflected/captured in both 6.8 and 6.10 as more work done in corresponding area.
I am okay to keep it in 6.8 channel access (general) now; and can help write some text there.

Question for you and alfred: I see a list of sub-items created in the POC/TTT doc (11-20/997), will corresponding items created in the SFD doc (11-20/566)?

Thanks!
Chunyu

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 9:50 AM Edward Au <edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello Chunyu,

Thanks.

#SP49 from 20/0408r3, which has been motioned and passed by the TG, is inserted in section 6.8 (channel access).   Do you prefer me to move it to section 6.10?

Regards,
Edward

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 12:19 PM Chunyu Hu <chunyuhu07@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi, Edward, Alfred:

FYI, there are two related SPs from me on this topic: 408SP1 and 697r3 SP. It does give some direction on this topic and further discussion. We have some SPs to be further worked on.

Thanks.
Chunyu

On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 7:40 PM Edward Au <edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, Alfred - section 6.10 (Quality of service for latency sensitive traffic) appears in 20/0566 only, not in 19/1262, as of now because the SP therein is yet to be approved by the TG.

Regards,
Edward

On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 10:27 PM Alfred Asterjadhi <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Actually it seems we don't have any motion passed on this topic in the most recent SFD so this row has yet to have any content.

I will keep the row in the document since we have a list of volunteers but I will separate it from the rest of the items.

Regards,

Alfred

On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 6:42 PM Alfred Asterjadhi <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Frank,

We can build more as we go. As of now I see only one SP in the compendium of SPs document under that subclause.

Regards,

Alfred

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 6:44 PM Frank Hsu (徐建芳) <frank.hsu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi, Alfred,

 

Regarding that there are may the latency related topics and there are many volunteers, we only have one SFD topic.

I would suggest to add “Link latency advertisement for MLO” under the category of “Quality of Service for latency sensitive traffic”.

I can serve as the POC of this topic.

 

Thanks!

 

Frank

 

From: Alfred Asterjadhi [mailto:asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2020 10:44 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] IEEE802.11be D0.1 Spec Text Writing: Volunteers Assignment

 

Hello all,

 

Thanks for volunteering on writing candidate spec text in preparation for IEEE802.11be D0.1.

 

I posted a revised version of the document below:

 

Please go over the following items:

  1. Check that your request for volunteering is included and allocated as intended (e.g., POC or TTT).
  2. Check rows that do not have volunteers (several rows were added as per received suggestions to align better with the skeleton provided by the editor) and volunteer for any of them (either POC or TTT).
  3. Check if anything is missing, if you have any questions and/or if you have any suggestions for improvement. 

I plan to post another version of the document on Sunday (deadline set to 17:00 ET) so please send related e-mails prior to that .

 

Best Regards,


Alfred

 

 

On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 8:00 AM Alfred Asterjadhi <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello all,

 

This is a call for volunteers for writing candidate spec text for IEEE802.11be D0.1.

In order to streamline the process and keep track of POCs, group of members working on each topic we prepared the document below:

 

The classification of the topics is based on the classification of topics present in the TGbe SFD (r10). Member's feedback on the classifications (renaming, subdivisions, etc.) is welcomed.

 

Please indicate which topic(s) you would like to volunteer for (adds to the TTT list), and whether you would like to be the POC for a particular topic.

 

For more information please refer to the guidelines for spec text drafting (Guideline-Spec Text Drafting for TGbe D0.1) that can be found in the document below:

 

Thanks in advance for volunteering and please let me know if you have any questions. 

 

Best Regards,

 

Alfred


 

--

Alfred Asterjadhi, PhD

IEEE802.11 TGbe Chair,

Qualcomm Technologies Inc.

Cell #:    +1 858 263 9445

Office #: +1 858 658 5302

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1