| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Oded, Thanks. I think multi-RU transmission and reception including non-OFDMA (which is preamble puncturing case) are mandatory in 11be. And thus, we may be not need to have capability. Best regards, Wook bong Lee
From: Oded Redlich (TRC) [mailto:oded.redlich@xxxxxxxxxx] Dear preamble puncture TTTs, Preamble puncture text is suggested to be inserted in a new sub-section 34.3.10.10 “Preamble Puncture”. Also new text in section 9.4.2.xxx (“EHT Capabilities Element”) will probably be added to define the sub-field “EHT PHY Capabilities Information field”. We need to define the preamble puncture Rx capabilities within this sub-field (similar
to how it is defined in 9.4.2.247 in 11axD6.0) Thus I suggest the following list of sub clauses to be added: Under 34.3.10.10 – Preamble Puncture
o
34.3.10.10.1 – General
o
34.3.10.10.2 – Preamble Puncture for PPDUs transmitted to a single user
o
34.3.10.10.3 – Preamble Puncture for PPDUs transmitted to multiple users Under 9.4.2.xxx.yyy – EHT PHY Capabilities Information field
o
Punctured Preamble Rx Please feel free to volunteer to write a specific section In addition, please let me know if you have any comments or if I have missed something BR, Oded Redlich To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |