| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi all, During yesterday’s conference call, I ran following SP (second SP in 985r6).
–
The RU Allocation subfield corresponding to RU242 in large-size MRU combinations of 484+242 is set to x (TBD) to indicate the zero users.
–
x is a value corresponding to the entry of ‘242-tone RU; contributes zero User fields to the User Specific field in the same EHT-SIG content channel as this RU Allocation subfield and is not unallocated’ in RU Allocation subfield
table.
–
The RU Allocation subfield corresponding to RU484 or RU484 in large-size MRU combinations of 484+242, 996+484, 2×996+484, and 3×996+484 is set to y (TBD) to indicate the zero users.
–
y is a value corresponding to the entry of ‘484-tone RU; contributes zero User fields to the User Specific field in the same EHT-SIG content channel as this RU Allocation subfield and is not unallocated’ in RU Allocation subfield
table.
–
The RU Allocation subfield corresponding to RU996 or RU996 in large-size MRU combinations of 996+484, 2×996+484, 3×996+484, 3×996, and 2×996 is set to z to indicate the zero users.
–
z is a value corresponding to the entry of ‘996-tone RU; contributes zero User fields to the User Specific field in the same EHT-SIG content channel as this RU Allocation subfield and is not unallocated’ in RU Allocation subfield
table. This SP is about detail description how to set zero user (which is not unallocated). Especially for the MRU, there is no separate zero user, so we need to identify how to use existing zero user. Please let us know your comment and feedback. Thank you. Best regards, Wook Bong Lee To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |