| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Liwen,
Please allow my late feedback.
Not sure if someone pointed out but here are my findings/thoughts:
-
9.3.1.8.2, Table 9-30a. Shouldn’t we add that 64 and 128 octets are only for EHT STAs, say in the NOTE? I think the change in 10.2.5.2 supports this restriction. Or should
we confirm this on motion?
-
9.3.1.8.7, Table 9-30c. Same comment as above.
-
10.25.2, 1st sentence in 1st para. MLD countable? Then “… two MLDs.”
-
33.
TGbe editor: Add new a subclause 33.x. (EHT
acknowledgment procedure) under clause 33x as follows:
à
TGbe editor: Add new a subclause 33.x. (EHT
acknowledgment procedure) under clause 33
-
33.x.1. “Support for BlockAck Bitmap field lengths of 32, 64, 128, 256, 512 and 1024”
à “Support for BlockAck Bitmap field lengths of
-
33.x.1, 2nd para. “An EHT AP shall not transmit a Multi-STA BA with at least one BA Bitmap lengths of either 512 or 1024 bits as a
response to an HE TB PPDU generated by at least one HE STA.” I think the intention was to not use those lengths when there is at least one HE STA participating in the transmission of an HE TB
PPDU. And I think an EHT STA will be also an HE STA. It may be clearer if it is “An EHT AP shall not transmit a Multi-STA BA that contains at least one BA Bitmap lengths of either 512 or 1024 bits as a response to an HE TB PPDU where
at least one non-EHT HE STA associated for the transmission.”
-
33.x.1, last para. “An initiating MLD shall maintain one one transmission window for …”
Double “one”s.
-
BTW, are such bitmap lengths only allowed between MLDs or allowed also between STAs in a single link? My current understanding is that there is no limitation. I just want
to check this.
-
Are the additional bitmap lengths mandatory for EHT STAs? I am not sure by the text in Motion 112, #SP7, [15] and [148].
Best regards, tomo From: Liwen Chu <liwen.chu@xxxxxxx>
Hello TTT members for MLO BA sharing and extension of SN space, Here is an initial draft text for
MLO BA sharing and extension of SN space: If you have comments, please let me know. Best Regards, Liwen To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |