| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Subir, I add some comments, pls find it in attached files Regards Boyce Yangbo 发件人: Das, Subir [mailto:sdas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Hello Edward, Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I was not aware of it. I did discuss with my co-authors and also received suggestions from the TTT members.
We have decided to replace ‘NS/EP’ with ‘NSEP’. We will reflect this in the next revision and also add a note in Clause 4.5.x since the forward slash
is used in other standards. Regards, _Subir
From: Edward Au <edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx>
Hello Subir, Thanks for your contribution. In REVmd, we try to minimize the use of slash (e.g., see CID 4216 in REVmd). It is because we have received comments that slashes are usually confusing - different people
may have different interpretations, such as or, and, or even xor. Do you think we can replace the slash between NS and EP with an appropriate conjunction? Regards, Edward On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 9:49 PM Das, Subir <sdas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
-- To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |
Attachment:
11-20-1434-00-00be-pdt-for-ns-ep-priority-access-BY.DOCX
Description: 11-20-1434-00-00be-pdt-for-ns-ep-priority-access-BY.DOCX