| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Jianhan,
A small typo Page 6, line 3: “The data subcarriers of a 996+484+484 tone MRU consist of the…”, Typo. Suggestion: mandatory support in pages 8 and 11 - may be good to combine with BW support (meaning make it conditional support based on BW) “It is mandatory for non-AP STA to support the transmission and reception of 484+242 tone MRU, 996+484 tone MRU, 2×996-tone MRU, 2×996+484 tone MRU, 3×996-tone MRU, and 3×996+484 tone MRU in OFDMA” Thanks, Ron
From: Lei Huang [mailto:nusleihuang@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Hello Jianhan,
Thanks for preparing this draft text.
I have a comment. A 2x996-tone RU is treated as a MRU in your draft text but is treated as a single RU in 20/1371r4. Such an inconsistency needs to be solved. Personally I prefer treating a 2x996-tone RU as a single RU due to the defined 160 MHz BW EHT PPDU.
Best regards, Lei
From: Jianhan Liu <jianhanliu@xxxxxxxxx>
Dear all,
The draft text for "Subcarriers and Resource Allocation for Multiple RUs" has been uploaded to the server. You can access it with the following link.
Your comments are welcome.
Thanks, Jianhan
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature