Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-PHY-Support for large bandwidth

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Hi Yan,

Thank you and the others for the effort of drafting this subclause. I have a few comments and suggestions.

The first sentence in the first paragraph sounds very vague, especially the word “only”. I suggest change the sentence to

A 20 MHz, 80 MHz or 160 MHz operating non-AP EHT STA is a non-AP EHT STA that supports for operations within ~~only~~ 20 MHz, 80 MHz or 160 MHz channel width, respectively~~, for the frequency band in which it is operating~~.

The last of sentence is deleted since it doesn’t really carry much information.

Change “frequency segment” in the last paragraph in page 1 to “channel”, just to be consistent with other non-AP EHT STA cases in this subclause. Actually, I prefer to use “sub-channel” for all cases for clarity.
Add “MRU” after “26+52-tone” in the 3^rd paragraph to be consistent with other cases.

Hope the suggestions above make sense. Thanks, again.

Best regards,

Ray

From: Yan Xin <Yan.Xin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 4:43 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-PHY-Support for large bandwidth

Hi TTT members, hi all:

I have upload a revision 1315r5 to the server based on the discussion in PHY session and further discussion after. Thanks Bin, Jinsoo and Steve for your suggestions.

You can access this revision from

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-1315-05-00be-draft-text-for-support-for-large-bandwidth.docx

The main update in this latest revision is to add the description on the support of a 20 MHz operating non-AP STA for operating in a wider BW.

Please review it and let me know if you have any comment.

Best regards,

Yan.

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1